SALT LAKE CITY — As a working group prepared to meet for the first time to discuss changes to Utah's open-records law, attention turned Tuesday to whether the Senate would repeal the controversial HB477.
Several senators contacted by the Deseret News expressed frustration with Gov. Gary Herbert's plan to call them back for a special session Friday to reconsider the bill, which makes wide-ranging changes to the Government Records Access and Management Act.
A repeal would require 15 votes in the Senate. As of Tuesday evening, 12 senators said they would vote for repeal, three said they would not and six were undecided. Another four will be absent — including former Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, who has retired — and four did not return phone calls.
Senate President Michael Waddoups, R-Taylorsville, said it is "very possible" that the Senate will take no action Friday. A special session can last up to 30 days, meaning legislators could hold off until a regularly scheduled interim day.
House Republicans on Monday signaled their intent to repeal HB477 Friday.
However, Waddoups said the working group — made up of public officials, both traditional and new media and members of the public — should have a chance to draft an alternative before HB477 is scrapped.
"The Senate's position, of those that I've talked to, is repeal and replace," he said. "We can't replace it until the work's been done."
Waddoups said he expects the working group to meet once a week for four or five weeks. Given that, he questioned why a special session, which he said will cost $30,000, was needed so soon — especially after criticism that the original HB477 was rushed.
"It looks like we're repeating the same problem again," he said. "We're rushing and not letting the system work."
Waddoups, Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, and Sen. Daniel Thatcher, R-West Valley City, said they would not vote to repeal the bill on Friday.
The Legislature already delayed the bill's effective date to July 1, but public protests have continued. HB477 would largely exempt the Legislature and several forms of electronic communication from GRAMA, allow increased fees for records requests and erase language favoring openness.
Senate Majority Leader Scott Jenkins, R-Plain City, did not say how he would vote.
“We’ve rushed through this thing once and made a mistake, and I don’t want to make a mistake again," he said. "Normally when we call these special sessions we know where we’re going. We don’t know where we’re going. That’s why I’m cautious at this point."
Not surprisingly, all seven Senate Democrats said they favor repeal, including Gene Davis, D-Salt Lake City, a sponsor of the original GRAMA legislation in the early 1990s and the only minority party senator to support HB477. In a statement, they said they would be happy to sponsor a repeal bill.
Five Senate Republicans also said they would vote to repeal: Curt Bramble, R-Provo; John Valentine, R-Orem; Steve Urquhart, R-St. George; Peter Knudson, R-Brigham City; and Dan Liljenquist, R-Bountiful.
"We ought to start back at ground zero," Valentine said. "We can't get an open and fair discussion in the present environment."
In a blog post Tuesday, Urquhart apologized for voting for HB477, saying it was the first vote he has regretted in more than 10 years in the Legislature.
"I screwed up. I'm sorry," he wrote. "At the end of the day, the public might or might not have agreed with some of the conclusions we reached; but, having never had the opportunity to participate, the public rightly is incensed and wants the whole thing thrown out. … The right thing to do now is to start over."
- Davis County honor student arrested in deaths...
- Man charged with killing Ogden officer found...
- Steven Powell can't go back to his home,...
- Letters to family show Steven Powell still...
- 2 from Provo killed in RV accident near St....
- Josh Powell made 'admission of guilt' in...
- Stump the Smith: Can you answer the questions...
- One third of millenials regret going to college
- Chaffetz not willing to take...
67 - Mia Love announces she's officially...
43 - S.L. draws up airport plans
33 - Couples registry gets preliminary nod...
29 - XanGo co-founder accuses partners of...
25 - 'We're here to serve all boys,' Utah...
23 - Man charged with killing Ogden officer...
22 - Search for Susan Cox Powell is over,...
21



I just have to ask how it passed the House and Senate overwhelmingly, and got the Governor's signature if so many of them want it repealed.
Do they really want it repealed, or are they fearing the public backlash?
90% of Utahns oppose this assault on transparency in the PEOPLE'S government. Ninety percent.
Can there be any more blatant proof that the Utah Legislature neither represents Utahns, nor even cares to pretend as though they do?
More..
I still have to wonder what they have to hide that makes them not want to repeal HB477 until they get a REPLACEMENT in place.