SALT LAKE CITY — Opposition is heating up to Snowbird ski resort's plan to put in a roller coaster in Little Cottonwood Canyon to lure summertime visitors.
A protest Monday in front of the Salt Lake County Government Center drew dozens of critics sporting signs and making pleas to stop the plan in its tracks because of fears it will despoil the canyon and harm the watershed.
"We live in Alta for different things," said Holly Hammer, 12, who was joined at the protest by classmate Georgina Chandler, 11.
The girls said the area is valued for its skiing, biking, hiking and natural beauty.
While both girls said they love roller coasters and frequently go to Lagoon, they do not feel the amusement ride would be appropriate in the canyon.
"We see Mount Superior from our classroom every day," Chandler said.
Organized by Save Our Canyons, the protest was in advance of a pair of appeals that will be heard on the issue by the Salt Lake County Board of Adjustment at 1:30 p.m. Wednesday.
The adjustment board, made up of volunteers appointed by Salt Lake County Mayor Peter Corroon, can either vote to uphold a January decision by the Salt Lake County Planning Commission or overturn the granting of preliminary approval for a conditional-use permit.
Should the board not overturn the planning commission's decision, the issue can then be taken to 3rd District Court.
"I think it is time that we ask Snowbird to withdraw their proposal," said Carl Fisher, executive director of Save Our Canyons.
"There are a lot of people upset with this who are protective of our canyons."
Critics contend county planning commission members rushed through the process during the busy Christmas season last year to reduce opposition by people who use the canyons. A request for a continuance by Salt Lake City's Department of Public Utilities was denied at the commission's Jan. 12 meeting in which the decision to grant preliminary approval was rendered.
The lack of what he says was adequate technical analysis led Salt Lake City Mayor Ralph Becker to issue a sternly worded letter to Corroon and the county's planning and development director, Ron Yoshinaga, earlier this month.
"A continuance would have given Snowbird, Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County an opportunity to conduct the necessary and appropriate due diligence to ensure watershed protection," the letter reads.
"I do not object to reasonable development in our ski resorts," Becker's letter says. "However, given the high visibility and nature of amusement park-style development at the base of Mt. Superior, one of the most iconic mountains in the Wasatch, I do feel this proposal poses a significant impact to the natural character of Little Cottonwood Canyon and the Wasatch mountains."
Canyon resident Katherine Ferguson said to have such an attraction with "people screaming their heads off" is unthinkable for an area treasured for its pristine wilderness qualities and quiet respite from the city.
Sarah Bennett, another canyon resident, is among those who also question the process and notifications that were or were not made.
"I think if Snowbird had a plan with any integrity, they would have come to us," Bennett said. "This took all of us by surprise. I believe it was very carefully engineered to evade public perception and limit public comment."
Yoshinaga disputes that and says all proper steps were taken to ensure the planning commission's meeting was properly noticed.
- Living on the edge: North Salt Lake residents...
- Women innovators leading by example
- Pleasant Grove homeowner shoot, kills man in...
- LDS artist J. Kirk Richards says leaps of...
- One man dead after attempted carjacking in Orem
- Lutheran, LDS leaders forge common ground...
- Hiker pulled from Bell Canyon after fall
- Who should pay? City, developer, residents at...
- One man dead after attempted carjacking... 38
- Herbert, legislative leaders starting... 29
- Mitt Romney tells UVU grads to 'live a... 22
- Poll: Majority of Salt Lake City... 15
- Governor, legislators leave 'baggage'... 14
- Jury convicts San Juan County... 12
- Attorney: Woman on trial in deputy's... 10
- Who should pay? City, developer,... 10