An example of flavored tobacco packaging, right, that could be mistaken for candy, left.
Matt Powers , Deseret News
SALT LAKE CITY — A bill before the 2011 Legislature would outlaw flavored tobacco products targeted at children, but at least one shop owner says the measure would inadvertently ban certain types of pipe tobacco as well.
Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clearfield, said his bill, HB170, is an attempt to stop the sale of flavored tobacco products, which are similarly packaged like candy and gum, to children.
"They're really targeting children with their marketing, and we also have the nicotine candy, which if a toddler gets a hold of, three or four pieces could actually cause death to the child through the toxicity of the nicotine," Ray said.
He claims flavored tobacco is aimed at roping in the next generation of tobacco users — children.
The bill would make selling flavored tobacco a class-C misdemeanor for the first offense and a class-B misdemeanor for subsequent offenses.
But shop owners are asking: What about flavored pipe tobacco?
Fred Cvar, owner of The Tinder Box, says pipe tobacco is not marketed toward children.
"It's not the sort of thing that would be ingested by anybody, let alone some kid," Cvar said. "I don't think that they would want to chew on it. If they did, it would be spit out immediately and perhaps it would have a wonderful effect on the kid to where he would never again want to ingest tobacco."
He said his store refuses to sell the products Ray is referring to and that there is no reason pipe tobacco — which is popular with older men — should be included on the bill. Leaving it in would hurt sales and tax revenue for the state, said his wife, Joan Cvar.
Ray explained that his bill is directed at products that blur the line between candy and tobacco, and pipe tobacco isn't among them. But he added that flavored tobacco is flavored tobacco.
"You've got a bit of a tradeoff, but those adults, if they like that, as they go through another state and they want to buy that, possession of it is not illegal," Ray said. "We're just saying don't market it to our kids."
The bill is currently waiting to be assigned to a committee.
e-mail: jstagg@desnews.com
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet, passes away
- LDS missionary 'stable' following hit-and-run...
- A firsthand perspective: Reflecting on the...
- Members recall Sister Monson's quiet devotion
- Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at least...
- Psychologist calls doctor accused of killing...
- Utah facing $1.2 billion-dollar water...
- Utah soldier presumed dead in Afghanistan
- Frances Monson, wife of LDS prophet,...
62 - Mitt Romney to live in Utah — at...
45 - Police say driver who hit 3 children...
27 - Angry Orrin Hatch: IRS guilty of...
19 - Utah GOP convention agenda includes...
19 - Attorney General John Swallow says he's...
16 - Mormon missionary age announcement...
14 - Angelina Jolie announcement leads to...
12



I love these legislators that try banning products to protect the children. Seriously, if that is the case with tobacco, and it is such a danger to society, just ban it altogether. However we all know that will not happen because they love the sin More..
The government has no place in telling you what you can or cannot eat, drink, smoke or otherwise consume. It has a very limited place in protecting the rights of others if your engagement in these activities infringes on them: that is, only if it is More..
I find bills like this very upsetting. I believe that a lot of it is due to misconceptions. I have been smoking a pipe since I was 23 years old, as did my father and grandfather, and none of us ever got cancer or any other health problems from it, More..