In several earlier articles, I demonstrated that DNA cannot currently (and might never be able to) verify the Book of Mormon. Those who claim otherwise, or who claim that DNA supports their particular geographic model, buttress their claims by cherry-picking scientific quotes and distorting their context while actually rejecting the very science behind DNA research. In a recent review of the topic published by BYU’s Maxwell Institute, Dr. Gregory Smith details why the DNA-proves-the-Book-of-Mormon claim is false.
The "Michigan Relics" are a loose collection of copper, slate and clay pieces discovered in the Hopewell Indian mounds of Michigan from the late 19th century until the 1920s. Many of these relics are inscribed with various Old World (or supposed Old World) texts or with graphics depicting various scenes from the Bible.
The problem is that the relics are all fakes — hoaxes produced, buried, “discovered” and marketed by several men looking for fame and fortune.
After carefully examining the relics, Elder James Talmage (a scientist and apostle) declared them to be blatant forgeries. Several non-LDS scientists have agreed. The "Michigan Relics" do not support the Book of Mormon (or one particular geography), and it is deceptive to suggest that they do.
- LDS Church responds to 'misinformation' about...
- Amy Adams, Glenn Beck present different takes...
- Colorado Mormons join other faiths in...
- My husband Alex Boye grilled in UK for 'I'm a...
- Ryan Teeples: BYU sports is for BYUtv, not...
- Dear son: This is why I can't save you from...
- Survey: Gay and lesbian population has unique...
- Religion contributes to Utah being most...
- Amy Adams, Glenn Beck present different...
70 - My husband Alex Boye grilled in UK for...
63 - Survey: Gay and lesbian population has...
45 - Ask Angela: He never pays for anything...
27 - Religion contributes to Utah being most...
27 - Gunman caught after shooting...
20 - Ryan Teeples: BYU sports is for BYUtv,...
20 - Ogden man shot as he knelt to pray is...
12



I don't get how people can spend their lives looking for something like this. Is this the Mormon equivalent of "Eldorado" and they will search forever thinking it is just over the next hill.
Brokenclay: I am amazed at the Christian tendency to turn the logic button on and off at will. Biblical Christianity has no support of any historical events that are relevant to Christianity. Does Jerusalem exist? Sure, but there is no proof of More..
Again, I appreciate Mike's willingness to dismiss "Mormon Myth". He knows that his job is to factually support his testimony of the Book of Mormon. That the BofM is not historical is not an option for Mike and yet I appreciate that he is More..