MILWAUKEE — While solar and wind power get most of the headlines, geothermal power is quietly gaining traction on college campuses where energy costs can siphon millions each year from the budget.
Schools from Wisconsin to New Mexico have geothermal projects in the works. There are 46 schools divvying up millions in federal stimulus dollars to advance technology that uses the temperature of the Earth, rather than coal-fired power plants, to heat and cool buildings.
So far this year, the Department of Energy has announced $400 million in grants to advance geothermal projects like those under way on a handful of campuses.
Geothermal technology has been around for decades, it works and it's increasingly affordable. At colleges that must maintain dozens of large buildings, the savings are magnified.
Those involved in the decision to pursue geothermal technology say they wanted to use less coal-fired power, although the schools also had to save money to justify the move.
The technology is a natural fit for schools like Boise State that sit atop geothermal springs. The school recently announced it expects to save as much as $80,000 per year in heating costs by doing so, and even more as the project expands. Yet schools in the Midwest and East are also turning to geothermal power using a different type of technology.
A typical geothermal system works like this:
On a warm day, the system draws heat from a hot building and pumps it underground where the soil absorbs it. On a cold day the process reverses — the system extracts heat from the earth and returns it to the building.
The process is so efficient that even though the underground temperature remains about a constant 55 degrees, the system can be used to chill water to 45 degrees or heat it to 170 degrees.
"That makes heating and cooling a whole new ball game," said Robert J. Koester, a Ball State University architecture professor overseeing one of the nation's most aggressive installations.
The Muncie, Ind. campus is upgrading all of its 45 buildings to geothermal technology, at a cost of $65 million to $70 million. The state contributed about $40 million, and because the system is expected to cut energy costs by $2 million per year, it should pay for itself in 12 to 15 years.
The savings won't translate directly into tuition breaks, Koester said, but will ease the school's pressure to find funding for other operational expenses.
- Looking for a hotel? See the best and worst...
- KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
- Many insurance plans fall short of law
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Selling adventure: How Backcountry.com's CEO...
- Valerie Phillips: Fond farewell to Morgan...
- Field of solar energy dishes to sprout at...
- Couple can't retire because of $116,000 in...
- KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
19 - Couple can't retire because of $116,000...
19 - OIl prices drop; will gas follow?
5 - Self consumption is considered greedy,...
3 - Eagle Gate Tower renamed World Trade...
3 - Home prices dropped 2.6 percent in year...
2 - Flying with your children just got more...
2 - Selling adventure: How...
1






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments