BYU professors: Glenn Beck doesn't speak for all Mormons

PROVO — Glenn Beck's radio show draws roughly 8 million listeners a day.

W. Cleon Skousen gave nearly 15,000 lectures and wrote close to 40 books during his lifetime.

But just because those two, politically conservative LDS voices are some of the loudest, it doesn't mean they speak for the entire conservative community, several BYU professors said during a panel discussion titled, "Glenn Beck, Cleon Skousen and LDS Conservatism."

"One of the fallacies about our political culture is that we've allowed Cleon Skousen and those on the right to dominate LDS political writing and to suggest that that's all there is," said BYU political science professor Richard Davis,"even though that is clearly not the case."

The discussion organized by BYU's Tocqueville Project included three BYU professors and Paul Skousen , the son of the late, prolific political writer who was formerly best known for his best-selling book "The Naked Communist."

However, Skousen has gained renewed interest since Fox News pundit Beck began touting Skousen's book "The 5000 Year Leap: A Miracle That Changed the World, Principles of Freedom 101."

"It's easy for me to see why (Beck) would have picked up on Cleon Skousen's book and found it inspiring," Davis said. "It fit in with his own performance."

And that's a lot of what Beck does — perform, the professors said.

"Most of the books of Beck's I've picked up … are like his manic, ADHD television personality," said BYU political science professor Ralph Hancock. "He's just throwing stuff out there. They're not meant to be read as discursive arguments. They're just thrown out there to try to entertain people who would rather be Twittering or playing video games."

Hancock said he agrees with some points made by Beck and Skousen but overall finds their arguments lacking in substance and scholarly research.

"I find in both a trace of anti-intellectualism," Hancock said. "My interest is to help connect a certain LDS conservative impulse or mood with a more deeply grounded intellectual conservatism. We can't enter the political field with the argument that all the bad, but smart people think X, but we good dumb people think Y."

Hancock told students that if they are serious about conservatism, they, and he, need to "study diligently to increase our confidence that our intense feelings are common sense … and can be rationally articulated."

Paul Skousen took the criticisms in stride and said his dad's entire life was focused on studying and asking tough questions.