MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight

Published: Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009 9:10 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

There's been a lot of talk lately about expanding the Mountain West Conference to include Boise State or perhaps BSU and two other schools to make a 12-team conference with two divisions.

Mountain West Conference officials I talked to Saturday said nothing is imminent as far as they know. Of course, they're not the ones who make such decisions. It's up to the nine presidents of the member schools to decide if they want to expand the league.

I've got another idea. Instead of expanding, how about contracting the conference and switching a few schools in and out?

If we're thinking football, which is the most important factor for conferences these days because of the money implications, let's start with the four currently ranked schools, Utah, BYU, TCU and Boise State. Next, you would want to add Houston, another highly ranked football school, which could give TCU some company in Texas; and Air Force, which beats most everyone every year but BYU, Utah and TCU.

To round out the league, let's add UNLV and San Diego State, because of their locations and potential to be good programs. (I know we've been waiting a long time, but sooner or later those schools have to become decent, don't they?)

Story continues below

Utah, BYU, TCU, Houston, Boise State, Air Force, UNLV and San Diego State would make a solid eight-school league. Even if UNLV and San Diego State never get much better in football, both are solid basketball schools that would make up for having Air Force and TCU, two non-powers in basketball, in the league.

The advantages to such a league would be many.

The league would have a much better chance to join the other six BCS conferences by adding a couple of strong football schools and getting rid of some of the deadwood.

With eight teams, each school would receive a bigger share of BCS and NCAA Tournament money.

The travel partners would line up pretty well with BYU-Utah, UNLV-San Diego State and TCU-Houston with only the Boise State-Air Force partnership not being geographically convenient. Having travel partners would save a bunch of money by eliminating all of the single-game trips in every sport but football.

But what about New Mexico, Colorado State and Wyoming, you say?

Sure, we'd feel bad for those three schools. But tell me what those three bring to the league football-wise or basketball-wise.

New Mexico hasn't won a football title since 1964, if you can believe it. Wyoming has had its moments over the years, but has struggled lately with one winning season in the past decade. Colorado State was a league power back in the 1990s, but has been mediocre for several years.

Recent comments

Wake up a look outside the Utah Bubble.
The PAC-10 doesn't want or...

Come on you guys | Nov. 19, 2009 at 6:25 p.m.

Step aside from the bias. I've lived back east and can tell you that...

Bias | Nov. 19, 2009 at 10:54 a.m.

"Utah has most certainly passed BYU in football. Two BCS bowl wins is...

Re:Utah is better than BY | Nov. 18, 2009 at 10:15 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Well put. I am the opposite. I lived in Utah and now live in Louisiana. I...

Don't weaken booster seat law

@Anonymous1:49p.m.: "Yes, it takes planning, which a lot of people don't...

Wrong, that's not how I read the criticisms. The criticism is not that the...

Editorial: Air standards changing

Beans | 4:04 p.m. Conservatives aren't the only ones who object to the...

Lawmakers question climate change

There is no such thing as man-made global warming. I know this. So did...

Why is the White House mocking anyone? That's a really good way to undermine...

Ultra Bob RedShirt | 4:03 p.m. Feb. 9, 2010 “According to...

Try the fudge dipped oreos. Awesome!

DeGeneres: Cowell is mean

He is not mean, he just tells it like it is, no beating around the bush, no...

Why does everyone act they had an inside on what was going on with Boozer in...

Advertisements