College appointment stands despite questionable process

UCAT board says it will continue with Brems in December as planned

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2009 10:04 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

Despite the fact that members of the Utah College of Applied Technology board of trustees may have violated state law in the recent appointment of President Robert O. Brems, things are moving along at the college without any changes anticipated.

UCAT Chairman Tom Bingham said Tuesday he had yet to receive a letter mailed to him by UCAT board member and Commissioner of Higher Education William Sederburg, which calls for a withdrawal of Brems' appointment and a lawful redo of the process. Bingham said he doesn't think the board did anything wrong "or we wouldn't have done it."

Sederburg believes the board should reconsider Brems' appointment, as it was made "in violation" of two portions of state code. He said there was no official notice of a closed session of the board of trustees, as required by the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act.

"I believe that state law intends that a published agenda item should be clear about when a selection is to be made," Sederburg said in his letter, which was also sent to the governor's office, the State Board of Regents and members of the state Legislature.

State law also requires that "the names of the final candidates for president of Utah College of Applied Technology shall be publicly disclosed." Sederburg said the decision not to publicly release the names of the two finalists was "a violation of the public trust given to the newly reconstituted board."

Story continues below

The 2009 Legislature voted to separate UCAT from regent supervision, giving the entity its own governing board and the authority to appoint its own president, with approval of trustees. Sederburg was the only member to vote "no" to Brems' appointment in the September meeting.

"It is insulting to me that the full board was not respected enough to give each of us an opportunity to ask the finalists a few questions before being asked to make such an important decision," he said. "It appears that the executive committee wants to make all of the major decisions privately, thereby excluding the board members representing the governor, state Board of Regents and others."

Sederburg said it is important to students that there be cooperation and mutual respect between UCAT and the credit-granting institutions, as well as to communities UCAT campuses reside.

Recent comments

Is anything remotely questionable ever a good idea?

Questionable | Nov. 11, 2009 at 9:27 p.m.

There is no leadership in UCAT, which was established in 2001. They...

Leadership | Nov. 11, 2009 at 9:27 p.m.

Sederburg is such a pompus baboon. Who delivers a letter to the press...

Sederburg II | Nov. 11, 2009 at 1:25 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

I know everyone but the TBird nation wanted them to lose today but what a...

Man recalls running from KGB

Thank you for your service to our country, and the personal sacrifice that...

TCU still has a chance

And since NYC is a bigger city than SLC, obviously the Nicks are a better...

I’m thrilled to hear about this! Where can I get one of those moon jar...

Robbed???????

Does anyone who supports this really think this is only going to cost what...

Very good Bingham!!!

yeah buddy!!!!! go bingham!!!

5A: Miners dig deep, claim crown

May I suggest you read the 3rd paragraph for the final score. I can only...

I wonder were Richie is going next year.

Advertisements