Expand sex education

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 10, 2009 12:01 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

In Cynthia Glover's letter (Readers' Forum, Nov. 6), she suggests public money should not be used to fund sex education; rather, it should be directed toward basic courses like science. First, public money is already being used to fund sex education. But the sex education it is funding is abstinence-only and slight variations thereof. What Rep. Lynn Hemingway and Dr. Audrey Jiricko are proposing is that some of that funding go toward an optional course (chosen by parents) that would cover more comprehensive material.

Second, isn't health education considered a basic course? As I understand things, it's a lot like science.

Missie Harward

South Jordan

Recent comments

Glendenb: If you haven’t a clue what is morel and right, then...

John C. | Nov. 11, 2009 at 3:28 a.m.

Why is a normal human function regarded with such...

Anonymous | Nov. 10, 2009 at 5:14 p.m.

Jeffrey - I am not sure what studies show a correlation between...

values and religiousness do matt | Nov. 10, 2009 at 5:10 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Thanks for posting the score Badger Brother. I couldn't find it anywhere else.

Why have 3 first team DBs and then 5 second team DBs?

@Laws of Nature | 4:02 p.m If you read the post that the original quote...

Focus: Put Christmas back in stores

Anytime there is a discussion on freedom of religion and government display...

Put those usc hats and hoodies on ice. Las Vegas or San Diego, anyone...

You should really see the movie before you write a review. You didn't...

"Where does it say God is not both?" "Can anyone hide in secret places, so...

Medicare cuts focus of health debate

Democrats are not cutting services, they are cutting the overpayment to Home...

Workers Comp may pay $15M

Where does the money come from?

I was raised in Arizona in a small LDS Community and lived in several Utah...

Advertisements