Can lightning strike twice at 'Melrose Place'?

Published: Monday, Nov. 9, 2009 7:44 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

Melrose Place" is one of those good shows that not much of anybody is watching.

Now, we'll have to define "good" before we go any further with this. "Melrose Place" (Tuesdays, 8 p.m., CW/Ch. 30) isn't the kind of show that you're going to see on PBS or the Discovery Channel; it won't be winning any Emmys for outstanding drama.

Or for anything else.

But it is good, trashy fun. Which is what a soap opera is supposed to be.

The new "Melrose Place" is a sequel to the original, which ran from 1992-99 on Fox. And, judging the new one against the old one, this version is off to a much stronger start.

The original "Melrose" was remarkably dull when it premiered. It was about a group of nice young people who lived in an apartment building off Melrose Avenue in Hollywood.

And shows about nice young people are, well, dull. Without conflict, you've got, well, not much.

The new "Melrose Place" learned from the mistakes of the original. The sequel started with a murder, and the new residents of that refurbished apartment complex are not such nice young people.

Hey, one of them is (probably) a murderer!

Story continues below

Publicist Ella Simms (Katie Cassidy) is a deliciously bad girl, and bad boy/thief David Breck (Shaun Sipos) has his moments.

What's most surprising about the revival is how well it has handled the integration of several original characters. It made sense to have Sydney Andrews (Laura Leighton) as the landlady/murder victim; the show even provided a believable-in-a-soap-opera-world explanation for how Sydney could have died in the original series and yet be alive — briefly — in the new show.

It makes sense to have Michael Mancini (Thomas Calabro) back as a semi-regular — he's David's father. And return appearances by Josie Bissett (as Jane Andrews Mancini) and Daphne Zuniga (as Jo Reynolds) were seamless parts of the plot.

So why is "Melrose Place" doing so poorly in the ratings?

It's not like there haven't been missteps. And not just the horrid plot line in which Lauren Yung (Stephanie Jacobsen) is paying for medical school by working as a high-priced prostitute.

Gag!

Casting Ashlee Simpson-Wentz as wacko Violet Foster has proved a huge mistake. If for no other reason than the simple fact that Simpson-Wentz can't act — and she's unintentionally hilarious when she tries.

The biggest problem might just be that it's hard to get noticed when you're on The CW and you don't have any vampires in your show.

So what better way than to try to do what the original "Melrose Place" did — turn to Heather Locklear for help.

Recent comments

OK, I agree with your point...BUT...you need to turn off the sporting...

re: Conejo | Nov. 11, 2009 at 9:31 a.m.

You people make me laugh sounds like you all watch too much t v and...

Anonymous | Nov. 11, 2009 at 3:40 a.m.

I love Melrose place!!!

Michelle | Nov. 10, 2009 at 4:46 p.m.

Image
Patrick Wymore, The CW Network

Heather Locklear returns to "Melrose Place" on Nov. 17.

previousnext

Latest comments

Girls basketball rankings

GO Union High School Cougars.

This may dead on arrival, but it is frightening that it is going to arrive....

15-month-old Rachel Toone dies

I am so sorry to hear about this. I hope the Spirit is with your family at...

Running game is missing

That was the most boring display of FB in a SuperBowl yet. Peyton played...

Scouts celebrate 100th today

I agree with the eagle scout mother. Scouting is a wonderful program and...

Sloan supports Boozer

Boozer is cancer or just destroys team play. look at clippers game all about...

White House mocks Sarah Palin

Down with this Palin movement. I will vote for someone to be the President of...

Guess Sarah can't use a teleprompter since she knocks down Obama for using...

Teacher merit pay debated

To Teacher and Proud Of It: My children have had teachers like you. You...

Preps of the week

We will see great things come from McKenzie! Way to go Girl! :D

Advertisements