House opens debate on health care overhaul bill

Published: Saturday, Nov. 7, 2009 10:02 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama's landmark health care overhaul moved toward a vote in the House Saturday after anti-abortion lawmakers won a chance to knock out language that would let people who get federal subsidies buy insurance plans that include abortion coverage.

Democratic leaders were hopeful they could pass the bill, giving Obama his biggest victory since last November's historic election, no matter how the abortion issue is decided. Obama made a rare Saturday visit to Capitol Hill in an effort to cement a majority to pass the legislation that is certain to be seen as a test of his presidency.

Abortion-rights supporters were outraged at the concession to abortion opponents. Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., said "there is a risk" that some in the Pro-Choice Caucus would vote against the bill as a result.

The bill would cost more than $1 trillion over the next decade. It would provide health coverage to tens of millions of Americans who don't have it now, require most employers to offer it to their workers and prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage based on a person's medical history.

"The status quo is unaffordable and unsustainable. Health care reform benefits all of us," said Rep. Allyson Schwartz, D-Pa., as debate opened on the House floor.

Republicans were united in their opposition to the bill, using procedural delays to slow the debate.

Story continues below

"The American people need to understand this is about a government takeover of the whole health care system," said Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga.

The most contentious issue in the 10-year, $1.2 trillion House bill is a new government-run insurance plan that would be offered alongside private coverage within new purchasing marketplaces, or "exchanges," where individuals and small businesses could shop for and compare options.

The abortion agreement was reached at midnight Friday after hours of intense negotiations brokered by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. Democratic Reps. Bart Stupak of Michigan, Brad Ellsworth of Indiana and other abortion opponents fought for and won an opportunity to insert tougher restrictions into the legislation during debate, despite fervent opposition from pro-choice liberals who are a driving force behind the overall bill.

"We wish to maintain current law, which says no public funding for abortion," Stupak said.

Federal law currently prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for abortions except in cases of rape, incest or situations in which the life of the mother is in danger. Left unresolved is whether individuals would be permitted to use their own funds to buy insurance coverage for the procedure in the federally backed insurance exchange envisioned under the legislation.

Recent comments

I'm in med school right now and freaking out over whether I'm going...

Future Dr.  | Nov. 7, 2009 at 9:02 p.m.

Obama was right when he promised he wouldn't unplug Granny from life...

Canadiandy | Nov. 7, 2009 at 8:54 p.m.

What debate! As Gore and the rest of the selfrighteous left says:...

debate | Nov. 7, 2009 at 4:12 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

New hope to unwed dads in Utah

In my occupation I have worked with many single moms and several single dads....

Considering the Minnesota debacle, I'm simply releived after last nights game...

Yemen raids al-Qaida hide-outs

You MUST be mistaken. There IS NO AlQaida in Yemen!!! Just like there WAS...

Just remember guys if Books calls you a paper tiger its a good thing lol. SS...

Susan Powell's family to speak out

Say some prayers for this family and these kids.

Aggies sign 5 midyear transfers

The WAC is a one man show and that is Boise. I think the Aggies have already...

I am terribly sorry that those doctors were so insensitive and cruel. I...

Top 20 boys basketball

So far the teams record that you have beaten have a combined record of...

BYU will win two National Titles? Wow you're way out there. Utah has two BCS...

@fools mock... "What other group is more consistently savaged (without...

Advertisements