School fears resonated in gay votes

Published: Friday, Nov. 6, 2009 10:01 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

SAN FRANCISCO — Gay marriage opponents pulled off another victory at the ballot box this week by using a tried-and-tested argument: Approve it and children will be taught homosexuality in school.

Voters seemed to be swayed by the message, both in Maine and in last year's gay marriage battle in California. And it has become an important part of the ever-evolving playbook of gay marriage opponents, who have now won 31 consecutive statewide ballot measures against the issue.

In Maine and California, voters were besieged with ad images of what would supposedly happen if same-sex marriage were legal: students going on a field trip to a lesbian wedding, elementary school kids reading books featuring gay couples, kindergartners learning about homosexuality from their teachers — all without any say from parents.

Critics assailed the messages as blatantly misleading fear-mongering.

"It's drawing on the fears of the unknown," said Sandy Maisel, director of the Goldfarb Center for Public Affairs and Civic Engagement at Maine's Colby College. "There's no evidence that it's going to happen, but there's very clear evidence that it's an effective campaign tactic."

Gay marriage opponents discovered the effectiveness in last year's successful effort to pass Proposition 8 to outlaw gay marriage in California.

Story continues below

After signing up to lead the campaign, political consultants Frank Schubert and Jeff Flint noticed that polls were showing voters tended to not have much of a problem with gay relationships.

With the help of focus groups, surveys and ammunition unwittingly supplied by their opponents, the two soon found a new way to frame the issue by focusing on education. It's not the first time gay marriage opponents have played the education card, but not until the California campaign did it became the preferred strategy. That is a departure from elections in recent years when the focus was almost solely on the argument that marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a woman

Schubert said he had an ah-ha moment in California when a focus group watched a campaign commercial featuring a Massachusetts couple who described how their 7-year-old son came home from school and explained that a man can marry another man, something he learned in a children's book.

One of the members of the focus group shook his head, and Schubert asked the moderator to inquire. The participant said he would be angry if something like that that happened to his kids.

Recent comments

There are over 250,000 children being raised by homosexual...

Here's the thing... | Nov. 7, 2009 at 9:55 a.m.

Alerting parents that their children will be indoctrinated that...

Indoctrination Immoral | Nov. 7, 2009 at 7:06 a.m.

"Scaring people that their children or grand children will be...

Freedom 2 marry if they agree | Nov. 7, 2009 at 4:57 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

It's REALLY annoying to have to go through 3 different websites to read the...

Minimum wage hurts black teens

@@All Knowing 11:54 a.m.: "Congress hasn't paid attention to the...

Ute linebackers expect much

Why are u guys still talking about the Sugar Bowl win LAST YEAR. It was a...

Whose fault is divorce? Well the states seem to have decided that they are...

Yes RedShirt, of course, I don't know what problem you are referring too,...

Letters: Judge should resign

...would have required this woman to pay back with interest those from whom...

Star on field, in community

On behalf of many of the negative and hate filled comments from BYU fans I...

This may be a little off subject but an earlier article in the DN stated that...

Please... outer darkness? I am amazed over and over at how quickly people...

Cougars O-line a strength

BYU commentators, Please drop all of the hate. The only reason we have a...

Advertisements