Lawyers call fund managers honest

Published: Friday, Nov. 6, 2009 9:22 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

NEW YORK — Two former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers charged with lying to investors always were honest about the risks of investing in securities linked to the volatile subprime mortgage market, a defense lawyer told a jury on Friday.

A co-worker who testified at a federal trial in Brooklyn "couldn't recall one meeting where they did not discuss the risks," attorney Susan Brune said in closing arguments.

Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin made sure investors knew that with their investment strategy there were "rewards, but there's risks, too," Brune said. "That's the deal."

Cioffi, 53, and Tannin, 47, pleaded not guilty last year to conspiracy and fraud charges — the first criminal case to hit Wall Street amid the housing market meltdown.

The eventual implosion of the defendants' hedge funds cost 300 investors $1.6 billion and started a domino effect that nearly led to the demise of Bear Stearns itself. The firm barely avoided bankruptcy in a rescue buyout by JP Morgan Chase & Co.

At trial, prosecutors showcased a series of e-mails they alleged revealed behind-the-scenes alarm at the hedge funds as their investments began to slide.

"The subprime market looks pretty damn ugly," Tannin wrote to Cioffi in April 2007. If Bear's internal reports were accurate, Tannin suggested, "I think we should close the funds now," and "the entire subprime market is toast."

Story continues below

The situation became so dire that Cioffi pulled $2 million of his own cash from the fund, but the pair still told investors that they should stay in and that the outlook was good, prosecutors said.

"The trial isn't really about hedge fund strategy," Assistant U.S. Attorney Ilene Jaroslaw said Thursday in her closing argument. "This case is about what the defendants said and what they did, and all their lies."

Cioffi's attorney, Dan Butswinkas, countered in his closing argument on Friday by accusing the government of relying on misleading, out-of-context "e-mail snippets" to try to turn his client into a scapegoat for a crash that was unpredictable and out of his control.

"We have proven that the government's case lacks credibility," he said.

Jurors were expected to begin their deliberations on Monday.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Reid sold his memory

The 1964 Civil Rights Act is more complexed than many admit. Both the...

From what I hear the leftist on this blog say about Sarah Palin, I could...

Let others shine in classroom

Hi, Bill, while I see your point I completely disagree. If this student...

He said it was a mutation in the "haemagglutinin" gene... May want to check...

Tiger Woods has chosen two professions that place him squarely in the public...

I just don't understand people who flock to so-called celebrities and...

Obama defends wars, accepts Nobel

Presidnet Obama seems to take no personal responsibitlity for ANYTHING going...

What an inspiring story I loved it and yes I'm crying for all of us in the...

"If you carry a swimsuit, you have to haul that wet fabric back down the hill...

If these are Federal dollars paying for the road then I don't believe they...

Advertisements