Senate rejects Bennett move to count illegals

Published: Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009 9:46 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats on Thursday blocked an attempt created by Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah, to require next year's census forms to ask people whether they are U.S. citizens.

The amendment, sponsored by Sen. David Vitter, R-La., and co-sponsored by Bennett, to a bill that funds the census was aimed at excluding noncitizens from the population totals that are used to figure the number of congressional representatives for each state.

Critics said the plan would discourage immigrants from responding to the census and would be hugely expensive. They also said that it's long been settled law that the apportionment of congressional seats is determined by the number of people living in each state, regardless of whether they are citizens. A separate survey already collects citizenship data.

Census data are also used to distribute billions of dollars in federal aid.

"The current plan is to reapportion House seats using that overall number, citizens and noncitizens," Vitter said. "I think that's wrong. I think that's contrary to the whole intent of the Constitution and the establishment of Congress as a democratic institution to represent citizens."

Story continues below

Bennett first raised the issue earlier this year when he introduced a separate bill to identify and count illegal aliens in the census. He did that as several conservatives are challenging him in next year's election and contending he is soft on immigration issues.

If Vitter and Bennett had been successful — and if noncitizens were excluded from the census count for congressional apportionment — states with fewer immigrants would fare significantly better in the upcoming allocation of House seats.

States such as California and Texas would fare worse than they would under the current way of allocating seats, which under the Constitution is based on the "whole number of persons" residing in a state.

Louisiana stands to lose one of its seven House seats in the upcoming round of reapportionment. Vitter says that if noncitizens were excluded, Louisiana and eight other states would keep or gain congressional seats that would go to California, Texas, Illinois and New York. Vitter said the other eight states are: North Carolina, South Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Mississippi, Michigan, Iowa and Indiana.

Vitter's amendment, however, would not have changed the way the congressional seats are allocated by counting citizens and noncitizens alike.

Census Director Robert Groves opposes the proposal and recently told lawmakers that it would greatly delay the decennial count.

Critics also said Vitter's plan would discourage immigrants from responding to the census and would be hugely expensive.

Recent comments

The language in the Constitution is quite clear, "... counting the...

@ John Pack Lambert | Nov. 6, 2009 at 4:25 p.m.

If the question is whether someone is or is not a citizen than it...

John Pack Lambert | Nov. 6, 2009 at 2:30 p.m.

Was what Bennett proposed ever done in a previous census?

Just a Question | Nov. 6, 2009 at 11:48 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Stocks climb on hopes for debt help

There's that word - HOPE again. Hope without proper action is depressing.

RE: Do as I say or I'm calling cops "That's the problem that people don't...

I am so sorry that the parents have lost both their sweet, beautiful little...

15-month-old Rachel Toone dies

We Love you Toone family and are praying for you.

Those who don't believe there is a God who created the earth and heaven, tend...

Aggies knock off Nevada

How many WAC teams are ranked right now?

The EPA decided to clean up the pollution in eastern Kentucky and Tennessee....

Get your heart checked out

It's nice to read an article discussing a Super Bowl ad and it has nothing to...

To Clueless at 5:13, My great grandfather's journal recounts that it was...

RE: Do as I say or I'm calling cops The instances you bring up are why I...

Advertisements