Supreme Court dismisses petition in UEP case

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2009 12:09 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

The Utah Supreme Court Tuesday dismissed a petition filed by attorneys and members of the Fundamentalist LDS Church asking for a supplemental briefing and oral argument.

The case was initially filed against 3rd District Judge Denise Lindberg, asking that she reinstate a request for "supplemental pleadings and scheduled oral argument" in the ongoing case regarding the United Effort Plan Trust.

The United Effort Plan Trust, which holds most of the FLDS property located in its primary locations of Hildale, Utah, Colorado City, Ariz., and Bountiful, British Columbia, is supervised by the 3rd District Court in Salt Lake City. Valued at more than $100 million, the trust was seized by the courts in 2005 amid claims that it was being mismanaged by FLDS leader Warren Jeffs.

As part of ongoing litigation in the case, the court requested a supplemental hearing and additional oral arguments on Nov. 18, 2008, after denying a motion to stay a Nov. 14 hearing that same year. At that time, the court also entered a "provisional stay" because it had disqualified the attorneys representing the FLDS and had asked that "privileged communications" between the FLDS leaders and their attorneys be provided to the court.

Story continues below

But when those representing the United Effort Plan and its interests then engaged in settlement negotiations and asked that the court halt its other motions, the court said that action negated the need for the supplementary hearings and arguments.

In this decision, they denied the latest petition calling for those court hearings, stating that the attorneys cited a rule that should only be used in emergency request situations. They also stated that you cannot combine that rule with another, as was attempted in this case, because it placed an "unfair burden" on the opposing attorneys in the case.

In its decision, the court's decision states that it handed down the decision in fairness.

"We note that we do not perceive any abusive intent or action in this case."

e-mail: emorgan@desnews.com

Recent comments

The UEP Trust has been stolen from a lot in the past. Trust...

re: Unfair burden? | Nov. 3, 2009 at 3:36 p.m.

Putting an unfair burden on thieves, that's rich! On the plus side...

Unfair burden? | Nov. 3, 2009 at 1:38 p.m.

Predator, have you ever been in Colorado City and Hildale? Would...

Tom | Nov. 3, 2009 at 1:16 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Boylen wants consistency from Utes

The Utes ARE consistent!!!

Lawmakers question climate change

BYU alum: your statement that this is "NOT a matter of scientific debate...

Bit of a messy win, but hey that's 4 on the bounce away from ESA :)...

The reason that Collie's comments were different that other's is that Collie...

At the age of 61, I'm doing many things I enjoyed as a child. However, I'm...

ala malone when a.c. green was chosen instead of him... lol. anyway awful...

Letters: Rein in lawyers

The author paints an entire profession with a broad brush. Most lawyers are...

Utah Jazz game at a glance

Miller family please fire Jerry Sloan and hire "Doug", anonymous blogger and...

Like Mom of Seven, we're raising them conservative, and Sarah Palin IS...

"Utah is in the third year of a 10-year health care reform plan." Ten years!...

Advertisements