Utah Jazz: Sloan not keeping tabs on Knicks

Published: Sunday, Nov. 1, 2009 9:29 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

The front office is no doubt doing it. Some Jazz fans are, too.

But even though Utah gets the bumbling New York Knicks first-round pick — and it could be a high lottery one — don't count on Jerry Sloan to start scoreboard watching anytime soon.

"I don't worry about that. I can't worry about that," the Jazz coach said. "I've got the picks right here, guys we've got. ... I don't even want to talk about it. I'm aware of that pick. I'm also aware of ours."

If he were keeping track, Sloan would know that the Jazz's magic number to secure the most ping-pong balls for determining the 2010 lottery draft order now sits at 79. The Knicks are off to an 0-3 start, and losing out would give the Jazz the highest odds of a winning a high pick.

Sloan won't take the bait.

"That's too bad," the coach said, when told about New York's slow start. "We still have to play them twice."

Utah's first game against the Knicks is next Monday at Madison Square Garden, where the Jazz haven't won since 2004. The teams have split their two-games-per-season series the past three years, but New York has won seven of their past 10 meetings.

Story continues below

It would do his team well to have the Knicks struggle this season — and make New York feel less bad about losing the long-due, trade-related pick if it's lower in the first round — but Sloan has never liked the losing-your-way-to-higher-picks-and-better-players theory.

That concept was brought up a lot when he was a player with expansion Chicago, beginning in 1966-67.

"I'd rather not be in a situation where you've gotta lose," Sloan said. "Why play basketball if you're going to lose to get good players? And then everybody (says), 'Oh, what a smart move they made.'

"I'm not into basketball for that reason," he added, "and I've seen it happen."

Sloan didn't mention when and where he witnessed that — and, no, he didn't even hint about a certain team that plays by the Alamo — but he laughed about a situation in which his bosses suggested it might be for their team's best interest to lose a game.

That happened, Sloan claimed, after he was asked and agreed to fill in for outgoing coach Ed Badger for the final game of Chicago's season in 1978.

"They said, 'If we win the game, we get a worse pick,'" Sloan recalled. "I said, 'Well, I'm not going down there with that in my mind to try to lose the game. That's not what I'm (all) about. I'm only interested in trying to win.'"

The Bulls, by the way, lost that game.

Sloan's coaching might have factored into the loss, who knows. But it wasn't on purpose.

"I did a (lousy) job," he said, chuckling.

Recent comments

Or tabs on anything else.

Big suprrize | Nov. 3, 2009 at 1:56 a.m.

If Brewer is the answer to a championship, I am moving to Greenland...

Miles | Nov. 2, 2009 at 3:45 p.m.

Cowboy Joe: I agree with you with a slight exception

if Jazz are...

fan | Nov. 2, 2009 at 3:20 p.m.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Revive full food tax?

Taxing food is an idea whose time has passed. C'mon, Utah legislators, don't...

I had "Brother" Pratt my freshman year at Orem Junior High School. He was the...

BYU football: Bronco weighs in on Hall

I'm pretty tired of this Max Hall stuff; I think everyone else is too,...

Yet again, we learn BCS is a big joke

Half of the teams in the Big 12 and SEC would have a reasonable chance to go...

As the story points out, this is why Utah gets these games: "The biggest...

does the Idaho legislature refuse to make animal cruelty a felony? They...

World datelines

Baghdad is in Iraq not Iran. U guys are smart.

Uh-oh. Here come the trolls extolling the dangers of light rail and how...

Revive full food tax?

Why don't we put all of the tax exemptions on the table? There are...

Have you been living in a cave for the past couple of years? It has been...

Advertisements