Barry Moldover's letter about health-care reform (Readers' Forum, Oct. 24) contains at least three faulty premises:
1. The "majority" of us want a "public option." We don't.
2. Nothing "controls" the prices of private health insurance companies. There is. It's free market competition, except to the extent that government regulation inhibits it (such as the inability to buy health insurance across state lines).
3. A "public option" would help "control" prices. It wouldn't. Government inefficiency would increase health-care costs and prices. Since when has the government "option" ever reduced prices, increased output and improved quality?
Almost never.
The free market does that.
Gregory Hess
Kaysville
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
53 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
51 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
41 - It's déjà vu all over again...
34 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
33 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
22 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
21 - Letter: Health and health care
21






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments