U.S. health-care debate focused on wrong questions

Published: Sunday, Oct. 18, 2009 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

My father-in-law was rummaging through old papers awhile back when he came across itemized hospital bills from his own birth in 1934.

Nothing puts the current health-care debate in perspective quite like a trip in the way-back machine — in this case to the Portland Sanitarium and Hospital in Depression-era Oregon.

And nothing focuses the problem quite like a glance at an old hospital bill.

My father-in-law's mother had severe complications. She ended up staying in the hospital 16½ days. Doctors told her she would die. (In fairness to them, she did ... 72 years later.)

The cost for all of this? Board, room and general care: $5 per day. Use of the operating room: $7.50. Treatments, medicines and laboratory fees ranged from $2 to $4.80. The grand total for 16½ days: $173.60.

I used a simple inflation calculator, (found at westegg.com/inflation/infl.cgi) to determine the bill would be the equivalent of $2,763.59 in 2008 dollars.

Story continues below

Perhaps that's not the kind of money young couples have lying around the house, but I'm guessing it's much less than a similar hospital stay would cost today. You could reasonably afford it, or find a way to get the money without too much trouble if you didn't have insurance.

Of course, simple comparisons never tell the whole story. In 1934, antibiotics were still more than a decade away. Many more sophisticated and expensive life-saving machines, medicines and procedures we take for granted today were not available. While I don't know the extent of my wife's grandmother's complications, it's doubtful they would require so long a hospital stay now.

But do hospital visits have to cost as much as they do today? If not, what can be done about it? These ought to be the questions driving the debate in Washington, not questions about how to extend insurance coverage to everyone. Focus mainly on costs and the coverage problem begins to take care of itself.

Any red-blooded capitalist can tell you that costs come down as more and more people compete to provide the same service.

The minute you decide to go down this road, however, you get arguments from some that health care is not a commodity and that it won't respond to competitive pressures. If you're suffering a heart attack or bleeding in the street after an accident, you won't take bids from competing hospitals.

Recent comments

Health care has gone up more than inflation would dictate, but so has...

Tuition Should be Examined! | Oct. 18, 2009 at 8:57 p.m.

Our nation’s founders knew firsthand that government is a...

Government health care! | Oct. 18, 2009 at 6:41 p.m.

Have you ever tried to become a doctor?

it is very diffcult....

RE: Too much pay hurts | Oct. 18, 2009 at 4:22 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Do you want them to look the other way when they come across a law being broken?

Letters: Modest tax hike needed

Mr Vincent, If you belive in your heart that you don't pay enough taxes......

Builder changing Payson plans

Why shouldn't he get approval if the project is a good one? Should he be...

Pitta doesn't win award

To: Re: Lame | 7:34 p.m. Dec. 10, 2009 He is a senior. I don't even know...

Letters: Reid sold his memory

Isn't this the guy who got up and gave a speach declaring the war is...

I agree with Lowell and laugh at both of us, but I love The Muppet Christmas...

With the collective bargaining agreement possibly changing in the NFL, rumor...

Austria passes gay civil unions bill

In 2006, the parliament of France courageously rejected same-gender marriage...

Texas preps strike Nike deal

I'm sorry but you must have never seen sports outside of Utah. Texas 1500...

Pitta doesn't win award

Why would a junior with worse numbers get the award if the senior out did him...

Advertisements