Breck England (Readers' Forum, Sept. 19) speculates that the Founding Fathers intended the term "general welfare" to include government-provided health care. There is no need to guess at what the writers of the Constitution meant by the term general welfare; let's look at what the founders themselves say. James Madison, the father of the Constitution, stated, "With respect to the two words 'general welfare,' I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators." Thomas Jefferson further clarified that "Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare but only those specifically enumerated."
Put another way, government-provided health care is just one more progressive step toward transforming the United States of America into something it was never intended to be.
Colin Quincy
West Jordan
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of marriage
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Millennial...
- Kathleen Parker: In politics, honesty and...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
47 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
43 - It's déjà vu all over again...
34 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
29 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
22 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
19 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
19 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments