FDIC may need some help of its own
Agency that insures bank deposits is facing red ink, could require a lifeline
NEW YORK — The government agency that guarantees you won't lose your money in a bank failure may need a lifeline of its own.
The coffers of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. have been so depleted by the epidemic of collapsing financial institutions that analysts warn it could sink into the red by the end of this year.
That has happened only once before — during the savings-and-loan crisis of the early 1990s, when the FDIC was forced to borrow $15 billion from the Treasury and repay it later with interest.
Today, the agency will reveal how much is left in its reserves. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair may also use the quarterly briefing to say how the agency plans to shore up its accounts.
Small and mid-size banks across the country have been hurt by rising loan defaults in the recession. When they fail, the FDIC is responsible for making sure depositors don't lose a cent.
It has two options to replenish its insurance fund in the short run: It can charge banks higher fees or it can take the more radical step of borrowing from the U.S. Treasury.
None of this means bank customers have anything to worry about. The FDIC is fully backed by the government, which means depositors' accounts are guaranteed up to $250,000 per account. And it still has billions in loss reserves apart from the insurance fund.
Today, Bair will also update the number of banks on the FDIC's list of troubled institutions. That number shot up to 305 in the first quarter — the highest since 1994 and up from 252 late last year.
Because of the surging bank failures, the FDIC's board voted Wednesday to make it easier for private investors to buy failed financial institutions.
Private equity funds have been criticized for taking too many risks and paying managers too much. But these days fewer healthy banks are willing to buy ailing banks, and the depth of the banking crisis appears to have softened the FDIC's resistance to private buyers.
Under the new rules, a buyer would need to maintain the failed bank's reserves at levels equal to 10 percent of its assets. An earlier proposal set the requirement at 15 percent.
The new policy also eases the rules on when private investors must maintain minimum levels of capital that might be needed to bolster banks they own.
- Looking for a hotel? See the best and worst...
- Many insurance plans fall short of law
- KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
- Couple can't retire because of $116,000 in...
- Selling adventure: How Backcountry.com's CEO...
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Eagle Gate Tower renamed World Trade Center...
- Valerie Phillips: Fond farewell to Morgan...
- Studies try to find why poorer people...
28 - KSL-TV welcomes 2 new anchors, new format
19 - Couple can't retire because of $116,000...
19 - House GOP plans summer tax cut vote
7 - Consumer confidence highest in 4½...
6 - Self consumption is considered greedy,...
3 - Eagle Gate Tower renamed World Trade...
3 - Home prices dropped 2.6 percent in year...
2






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments