California's budget difficulties hold lesson for U.S., if we'll listen
WASHINGTON — California's budget debacle holds a lesson for America, but one we will probably ignore. It's easy to attribute the state's protracted budget stalemate, now temporarily resolved with about $26 billion of spending cuts and accounting gimmicks, to the deep recession and California's peculiar politics.
Up to a point, that's true. Representing an eighth of the U.S. economy, California has been harder hit than most states. Unemployment, now 11.6 percent (national average: 9.5 percent), could top 13 percent in 2010, says economist Eduardo Martinez of Moody's Economy.com. Meanwhile, the requirement that any tax increase muster a two-thirds vote in the Legislature promotes paralysis. Democrats prefer tax hikes to spending cuts, and Republicans can block higher taxes.
All this produced the recent drama: plunging tax revenues and the state's resulting huge budget deficits; endless negotiations between Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders; the deadlock that led the state to issue scrip (in effect, IOUs) to pay bills; and a final agreement on a 2009-10 budget. But there is also a bigger story with national implications. California has reached a tipping point. Its government made more promises than its economy can easily support. For years, state leaders papered over the contradiction with loans and modest changes. By overwhelming these expedients, the recession triggered an inevitable reckoning.
Here's the national lesson. There's a collision between high and rising demands for government services and the capacity of the economy to produce the income and tax revenues to pay for those demands. That's true of California, where poor immigrants and their children have increased pressures for more government services. It's also true of the nation, where an aging population raises Social Security and Medicare spending.
California is leading the transformation of politics into a form of collective torture: pay more (higher taxes), get less (lower services). Make no mistake: The spending cuts and tax increases the state enacted to bridge its budget deficits are not cosmetic. In February, the Legislature agreed to a penny increase in the state sales tax, bringing the total — including local sales taxes — to about 9 cents or more. Top income tax rates, already among the highest in the country, were raised. So were motor vehicle registration fees. Spending cuts approved in February and July are deep. Together, the cuts equal almost 30 percent of the general revenue fund and will affect schools, prisons, colleges and welfare.
- In our opinion: Editorial: Millennial...
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of marriage
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- Letter: Job creation should be a top...
- Kathleen Parker: In politics, honesty and...
- U.S. is moving toward the same fate as...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
50 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
47 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
35 - It's déjà vu all over again...
34 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
31 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
22 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
19 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments