Many people hoped that the election of a black president of the United States would mark our entering a "post-racial" era, when we could finally put some ugly aspects of our history behind us.
That is quite understandable. But it takes two to tango. Those of us who want to see racism on its way out need to realize that others benefit greatly from crying racism. They benefit politically, financially and socially.
Barack Obama has been allied with such people for decades. He found it expedient to appeal to a wider electorate as a post-racial candidate, just as he has found it expedient to say a lot of other popular things — about campaign finance, about transparency in government, about not rushing legislation through Congress without having it first posted on the Internet long enough to be studied — all of which turned out to be the direct opposite of what he actually did after getting elected.
Those who were shocked at Obama's cheap shot at the Cambridge police for being "stupid" in arresting Henry Louis Gates must have been among those who let their wishes prevail over the obvious implications of Obama's 20 years of association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Anyone who can believe that Obama did not understand what the racist rants of the Rev. Wright meant can believe anything.
With race — as with campaign finance, transparency and the rest — Obama knows what the public wants to hear, and that is what he has said. But his policies as president have been the opposite of his rhetoric, with race as with other issues.
As a state senator in Illinois, Obama pushed the "racial profiling" issue, so it is hardly surprising that he jumped to the conclusion that a policeman was racial profiling when, in fact, the cop was investigating a report received from a neighbor that someone seemed to be breaking into the house that Gates was renting in Cambridge.
For those who are interested in facts — and these obviously do not include Obama — there has been a serious study of racial profiling in a book titled "Are Cops Racist?" by Heather Mac Donald. Her analysis of the data shows how this issue has long been distorted beyond recognition by politics.
The racial profiling issue is a great vote-getter. And if it polarizes the society, that is a price that politicians are willing to pay in order to get votes. Academics who run black studies departments, as Gates does, likewise have a vested interest in racial paranoia.
- In our opinion: Editorial: Millennial...
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- Letter: Job creation should be a top...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of marriage
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- U.S. is moving toward the same fate as...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- Kathleen Parker: In politics, honesty and...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
53 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
49 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
40 - It's déjà vu all over again...
34 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
32 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
22 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
20 - Readers' forum: We the people want debate
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments