A National Rifle Association member takes aim as he looks at a display of handguns during a convention.
Associated Press
Kurt Vonnegut said it best. Pistols are machines for killing other people. That's all they're good for.
And the unfortunate showdown in Bluffdale this past week proves the point.
It's no secret the Deseret News has been concerned over the years with firearms in public. Concealed weapons, in our book, have no place in schools, in churches and in the parking lots of private businesses.
Today, we add they have no place on "neighborhood watch" patrols.
We've also said that guns have a habit of hurting the innocent. The tragedy of handguns isn't that the guilty end up paying but that the decent do.
Such was the case in Bluffdale. Two well-meaning adults met on the street at night and — quick on the trigger — didn't bother to find out each other's motives before "slapping leather." Both men, by all reports, are good men. They are conscientious, kind and want the best for people.
They wanted to make their community safe.
Well, we have to ask. Does Bluffdale feel safer now?
Will people from the rest of the valley think twice before visiting the town after dark?
Get out your letter-writing kits, we're about to make some points we've made many times before.
First, tough guys don't pack firearms. Fearful guys do — people who see everyone around them as a threat and think the worst of every face they don't recognize. Guns don't showcase strength, they showcase weakness.
Second, guns do not make homes safer, they make homes more dangerous. Statistics prove it.
Third, anyone who feels they must "pack heat" while attending church has a very low opinion of God's children.
Fourth, putting pistols in the hands of school teachers may be the worst American idea since the Edsel.
Fifth, revolvers solve nothing. They complicate the problem.
Six, the NRA crowd has it right: Guns don't kill people, people kill people.
We've seen too many gunshot deaths to argue.
In the end, we urge citizens to dial it back.
Shoot your mouth off if you must. Just don't shoot someone else's off.
- Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running shoe...
- Snapshot of 2013 in political cartoons
- Timothy R. Clark: Graduation advice for my...
- Letters: Threats justified
- My view: Nothing sinister about Common Core
- State pensions threaten to bleed states dry
- In our opinion: New leader in Iran, but...
- In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
- Letters: Stop the witch hunt
35 - John Florez: Show leadership on...
31 - Supreme Court, Congress, citizens: The...
27 - Letter: Media failure
25 - Robert Bennett: Sticking to facts is...
23 - Letters: Threats justified
23 - In our opinion: Limit the power of the...
18 - Doug Robinson: Utah man's new running...
17



What do you suggest if criminals are the only ones who have guns? They do not obey gun bans you know! How do you recommend we protect ourselves against them? Kung Foo? A gun in my hand is much better than a cop on the phone! I own a handgun and More..
How many cops shall we hire to protect a populace who is totally unarmed and all the criminal know we are all unarmed?
You are more likely to shoot someone in your family than you are to shoot one of the bad guys featured in your cliched argument. Which was the thrust of the editorial. There was no mention of banning guns, just a plea for numbskulls to leave them More..