Ogden mayor vetoes 3 contentious policies

Published: Friday, July 10, 2009 1:48 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

OGDEN — Mayor Matthew Godfrey has issued a veto over three contentious policies established by the Ogden City Council in June.

The city still maintains its operating budget established by the council, including a year's worth of funding for the Marshall White Community Center.

Godfrey and the Ogden-Weber Community Action Partnership have come to an agreement for the nonprofit organization to begin managing the center, which houses a swimming pool, boxing ring, gym and classrooms.

Residents cried foul because they feared the Ogden-Weber Community Action Partnership would close the pool to make room for more classroom space. And the council, seeking to assuage those fears, approved a policy stating that the center and its pool shall be maintained.

The council also approved two similar statements regarding the Lorin Farr pool and the El Monte and Mt. Ogden golf courses.

In a memo to the council explaining his reasoning for vetoing the three policy statements, Godfrey reiterated his arguments from that June 16 council meeting.

"These sections violate the principles of separation of powers which control the council-mayor form of government," Godfrey said, adding that they "illegally infringe upon valid and enforceable contract rights."

Story continues below

Because Godfrey already had a contract with the partnership, the policy statements fly in the contract's face and could cause legal problems for the city, he said. The Ogden-Weber Community Action Partnership is scheduled to take over the center's lease.

Council members said they felt the policy statements were their only recourse because the contract couldn't guarantee the Marshall White pool would remain open. The partnership has said it will strive to keep it open but can't promise.

Council members expressed disappointment that only Councilman Jesse Garcia was included in contract discussions, not the entire council.

Godfrey's memo maintains that the vetoed sections usurp his executive authority over property and program management in the city.

"I respectfully urge the council to abandon any attempts to renew the (vetoed) provisions or to adopt similar provisions in the future," the mayor wrote.

City Council executive director Bill Cook said the next opportunity for the council to discuss the vetoed provisions is during the Aug. 4 council meeting. If the council were to override the veto, it would take five of seven votes to do so.

e-mail: jdougherty@desnews.com

TWITTER: desnewsdavis

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: 'Liberal conceit'

Any corporation you owe money to services will have a court order in you...

Mitt Romney tickets on sale

If Romney is waving his fee What are they spending all the money on to barely...

So who won the boy's game????????? This is a great rivalry between two...

Here are Max Hall's Top 10 wins

again, the beginnings of yet another BYU vs Utah bash-a-thon. No doubt...

Easy Chuck some people just like to say rude or just be ignorant.I feel ya...

any win is a good win, and especially a road win...Jersey or not...now if...

Conan mocks Orrin Hatch, Mormons

Orrin at least tried to promote your faith and not bash it. I find the song...

re: michaelin --I agree with you. It seems nowadays that people are all about...

Scuba diving in Utah

There are lots of people that can't afford to go to those places such as...

2 children escape burning home

The article does mention the ages of the kids and in my non-expert opinion, I...

Advertisements