Federer just may be the greatest ever

Published: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 12:45 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

Pardon me, I hate to rain on the Tiger Woods parade, but why is everybody so focused on this guy as the World's Greatest Athlete?

Care to consider another nominee for the honor?

What about Roger Federer?

Tiger is getting all the attention and adulation, except during the two or three annual interruptions to fuss over Federer's latest victory in a major. We are obsessed with Tiger. It's Tiger 24/7 — updates about his wife, his knee, his surgery, his rehab, his baby, his comeback, his endorsements, his latest amusing TV spot, his latest amusing interview (he smiled! He made a joke!).

Tiger's popularity is partly attributable to his being an American, which draws the big American audience and thus network TV and sponsors. And, of course, there is Tiger's prodigious talent, which puts him in the company of others who have risen above (and beyond) their sport — Gretzky, Jordan, Ali.

But what about the other guy — the Swiss tennis player? He doesn't look the part, with his thin, nondescript, man-on-the-street build, but he's already being widely hailed as Greatest Tennis Player Ever. He's got cat reflexes, Bjorn-Borg cool and footwork by Astaire.

Story continues below

Here it is — the case for Federer as World's Most Greatest Athlete (and for a moment, we will suspend the great debate about whether golf is a sport and golfers are athletes):

I'll begin by making just two points:

1. Federer's thrilling five-set Wimbledon victory over Andy Roddick on Sunday made him the all-time leader in Grand Slam victories, with 15.

2. He is only 27 years old.

I rest my case.

OK, not quite.

Tiger is 33 years old and has victories in 14 majors in 13 years, leaving him four wins behind record-holder Jack Nicklaus.

Federer is six years younger than Tiger, and he has claimed 15 Slam victories in a seven-year period.

He has done this in a sport that is much more athletic, more grueling, more demanding and more physical than golf (ask Rafael Nadal).

Yet Federer has appeared in 21 consecutive Grand Slam semifinals. He won both Wimbledon and the U.S. open five consecutive times. During one stretch, he claimed 27 consecutive wins in a Grand Slam.

Who can touch that?

He regained the No. 1 world ranking last weekend after loaning it to Nadal for a year. Before that, he was ranked No. 1 for a record 237 weeks — that's four and a half years.

He has won Wimbledon six times, the U.S. Open five times, the Australian Open three times and the French Open once. He's won on clay, hard court and grass. He could win on linoleum if he had to.

Recent comments

The article doesn mention Sampras because Roger now has more major...

TJ | July 8, 2009 at 12:38 p.m.

It's not even close. Tiger is far and away the most dominate athlete...

Chadders | July 8, 2009 at 11:20 a.m.

If you study the history of tennis you will see Federer is playing in...

NO WAY | July 8, 2009 at 8:40 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

nothing great, but surrounded by a pretty good core team - and that credit...

I'm shocked Leon agreed with keeping John in there. Then again, if they EVER...

BYU's old uniforms?

We need to add a few more facts to the 9:56 a.m. post. PAST = 1....

BYU would like friendlier rivalry

Nobody smuggled a beer into the Utah-BYU game last, kept it the whole game,...

byu by 1

Thanks for showing, Lenora, that leading begins in the home. No wonder you...

Hall's legacy measured today

Yes three ten win seasons in a row :) Like picking our stats? Well, if...

To Mike / 4:44 p.m. If you read all of the news articles, you will know...

BYU's old uniforms?

I love the current uniforms! How silly to go back to the old ugly uniforms...

Logan aims for impact on Wynn

I can't wait for this time tomorrow and all the excuses the B Whine U fans...

Advertisements