Utah Jazz: Paul Millsap valuable but not a franchise changer

Published: Saturday, July 4, 2009 11:45 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

Because I've never had an agent or anyone bidding over my services, I don't completely understand the concept of free agency.

Paul Millsap is entertaining offers this week, and if he gets what he wants, the end result will be a salary that starts at $10 million. Per year, not per eon. Considering he made about $800,000 this year, that would be a 1,100 or 1,200 percent raise.

I'm all in favor of the Jazz retaining Millsap and giving him a generous bump in income. They can do that by matching any offer another team makes. The hazardous part is if someone offers him cuckoo money, say, $12 million or $14 million a year, and the Jazz buckle under the fear of having him return to haunt them. Then they're committed to a multiyear deal, at a huge price.

Millsap is a fine player but not a perennial All-Star. And he's certainly not a franchise player. He's a relentless, tough, no-nonsense guy. He gathers up the ball from off the floor, the rim, the glass and the loading docks, if necessary, and keeps it in play. There's not a team in the league that wouldn't want him.

But he's not a superstar.

Story continues below

I know it's a different era, with a different marketplace, but here's some food for thought: If Millsap gets $11 million a year, he'll be earning as much as 10-time All-Star John Stockton ever did.

There could be worse things than losing Millsap to free agency.

Signing him to an overpriced, never-ending contract, for example.

The Jazz need look no further than their own history to remember times when, in the heat of the moment, they paid too much for a very good player. Remember Andrei Kirilenko? He used to be a star in this town. He was supposed to be the cornerstone of the new Jazz. Now he's a confused, unpredictable player who will make $16.5 million next season. He's good but not good enough to lead them to the top.

These days he couldn't lead them to a 7-Eleven, much less the NBA Finals. Meanwhile, his salary is hindering the Jazz from re-signing Millsap.

It's amazing how the marketplace and the moment dictate things in the NBA. In 1997, the Jazz signed Greg Ostertag to a six-year, $30 million contract extension. That doesn't seem like a lot now, but back then it was plenty for a guy who wore a Fred Flintstone tattoo.

On the day of the signing, Larry H. Miller, Jazz owner, said: "People always ask what's going to happen when John and Karl are gone and what the future will look like for the Jazz. As I thought about it. . . it struck me that a big part of the answer to that question is sitting next to me."

To my horror, sitting next to him were Jazz G.M. Tim Howells and Ostertag, neither of whom was capable of dunking on Shaq.

Recent comments

We all know that the players are overpaid and i wish that there were...

Does Money make the player? | July 10, 2009 at 2:59 p.m.

Jsmack,

I'm pretty sure you mean Rasheed Wallace, rather than Ben....

CJ3 | July 8, 2009 at 9:12 a.m.

isn`t that good of a outside shooter,average at best,and he does...

miles | July 8, 2009 at 8:19 a.m.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Murder-suicide in West Jordan

As a close friend to Michelle for over 30 years, I know she will be sorely...

Au revoir Dr. Mortenson.

Hey UTE Fans the silence is so sweet. To the wise fish (Bass) even Hafoka...

Should the assistant coaches decide to go, I wish them well in their next...

Abortion coverage riles Catholics

If you know what I mean....Anyone who ENABLES this extreme, far-left agenda...

The officiating in this game has clearly been one-sided. First drive,...

Chuck Nunn- Playing 48 minutes isn't going to get him into shape either....

Attempting to deceive the defense? Are the refs serious. That is the WHOLE...

"Massachusetts already shut down the Catholic church's adoption program...

Catholics Rule, and everyone knows this.

Advertisements