The BCS sure won't fix itself, so Congress has to step in

Published: Saturday, July 4, 2009 11:41 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

This week Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) will either trigger a meaningful debate on the legality of how our college football system works, or he'll be castigated as a grandstanding gasbag crying foul because a team from his state didn't play for a national championship in January.

So far the national media have primarily made fun of the hearing, which is scheduled Tuesday in the nation's capital. The majority of the masses, however, do not like the way college football is manipulated by the Bowl Championship Series and want it fixed.

Even the Las Vegas Sun, a newspaper circulated within Mountain West Conference borders, editorialized a few days ago that Congress has better things to do than stage a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the BCS.

But even that op-ed page blather is populist drivel. Congress, for all its power, has about as much credibility as the BCS. So, what's the harm? It might delay making us into Canada or Sweden for another day.

Something has to be done. Those who can instigate change — university presidents — are afraid to do anything to disrupt ties to historic bowls like the granddaddy of them all, the Rose Bowl in Pasadena. They also fear a breakup of the NCAA with the "elite" schools forming their own, separate organization.

Story continues below

Those who govern the NCAA shy away from meaningful college football championship reform. They've left that to an outside contractor, the BCS, which arrogantly has bucked practically all oversight.

But let's be frank here. If the BCS is to evolve or change, it is not going to come from the six elite conferences that set up the alleged cartel. This was evident in how BCS commissioners easily dismissed MWC commissioner Craig Thompson's proposals for reform.

Change will only come from big-time political pressure — a blow with a big hammer.

While the BCS has grudgingly evolved and fine-tuned itself the past half decade — even worked to be more inclusive and share some of the gold — it only did so after tremendous pressure and criticism nationally, along with the threat of governmental involvement.

For all the praise and flak Hatch will receive in coming days, the fact that the BCS is a gigantic enterprise conducting business inside the United States makes it a legitimate topic. Its exclusionary tactics, by design, are fundamental to its existence.

By law, Congress, the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission are required to investigate an illegal monopoly.

Recent comments

THERE IS A SPOT GUARANTEED TO THE NON BCS SCHOOLS.

THE BCS IS A...

Anonymous | July 7, 2009 at 4:16 p.m.

This is dumb. A non-BCS conference is guaranteed one of the BCS...

Blauch | July 7, 2009 at 4:06 p.m.

What are you talking about? Most of us are talking about the right...

To: BYU Loves to play the blame  | July 7, 2009 at 1:41 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

To: 'New Yorker' You blow your own credibility when you speak like that.

For RSL, being late worked

No, the Seahawks play at the Vikings on sunday. The game is still at Qwest...

Letters: Bill curbs right to choose

I disagree with the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan, therefore I have a...

EXTREMELY OVERRATED!

Broncos make Aggies pay

The Aggies are definitely on the right track now, and expect them to be as...

Isn't amazing how the best team in the state can't even win games?

3A: Juan Diego's last-gasp play

decent catch

3A: From happy to heartbroken

I would like to thank the Juan Diego players and the Hurricane players. The...

Boozer looking like 'the old Booz'

You Boozer lovers are in for a big surprise. He will play hard this year...

Utah Rep. Carl Wimmer bills

I am amazed at how many liberalies there are even on this forum. Welfare is...

Advertisements