Federal probe finds problems with chelation study

Published: Thursday, July 2, 2009 1:04 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

A federal investigation has found that heart attack survivors enrolled in a study of a controversial alternative medicine treatment were not told enough about potential dangers from the drug being tested, including death.

The study is testing chelation — infusions of a drug that in this case has been removed from the market for safety concerns. A different type of chelation is used to treat lead poisoning.

Findings from the investigation were revealed this week by the U.S. Office for Human Research Protections in a letter to the three medical centers leading the study.

The probe found that several doctors doing the study had been accused of poor practices by state medical boards or involved in insurance fraud, and that at least three are convicted felons. While "concerning," this doesn't prevent them from participating in federal research, the government's letter says.

Safety issues involving the study drug were referred to the federal Food and Drug Administration to investigate.

Federal officials recommended corrective steps to researchers, but have allowed the study to go on while the probe continues — a decision that angered critics.

It is "incredibly unethical, subjecting anyone to these risks," said Arthur Caplan, bioethics chief at the University of Pennsylvania. "This study should not be going on."

Story continues below

The study is sponsored by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. A spokesman for the heart institute — the main sponsor — declined requests for comment.

The $30 million study, with 1,500 participants so far in more than 100 sites around the country, is testing high doses of vitamin and mineral supplements and chelation (pronounced "kee-LAY'shun"). Though used for lead poisoning, it has not been proved safe or effective for heart disease.

Chelation involves periodic infusions of a drug — in this case, disodium EDTA, a different substance than what is used to treat lead poisoning. Proponents claim that the drug can flush out calcium that has built up in artery walls. Stiff or clogged arteries can lead to heart problems.

Its use has been highly controversial, and the American Heart Association and other groups have spoken out against it. EDTA carries a risk of kidney failure, bone marrow problems, shock, low blood pressure, convulsions, heart rhythm problems, allergic reactions and breathing troubles, the heart association's Web site says.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

'The fact is, in order for depleted uranium to be hazardous it must be eaten,...

Tackle Zane Beadles does it right

I'm sure that none of your lofty players have ever gone too far on a play....

Anti-religious rants | 8:47 a.m. Dec. 18, 2009 The author brought up...

There is only so much any of us can do to prevent heartache, challenge, and...

re: Movie review, Good heavens get over it. Who cares if the woman wear...

Letters: 'Selfishness' is motto

RedShirt | 9:44 a.m. Dec. 18, 2009 To "King Benjamin - Mosiah 4 | 8:58 a.m....

Heaps, Ross to BYU in January

PAC 10 would never invite BYU because of the concerns with academic censorship.

In response to Terribly Sad. I was in a similar situation. My husband had...

Duh, Charles. Not everyone is so adept at shooting their mouths off. Deron...

Parents rally behind fired teacher

And this is why my kid goes to PUBLIC school. Where speech and other civil...

Advertisements