Summum wants lawsuit against Duchesne dismissed

Decision comes after Duchesne relocates Ten Commandments

Published: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 11:49 p.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

DUCHESNE — An attorney for the Salt Lake City-based religion Summum has asked a federal judge to dismiss the group's lawsuit against the city of Duchesne.

Brian M. Barnard, in a motion filed Friday, asked for the lawsuit to be dropped because Duchesne moved a Ten Commandments monument from Roy Park to the city cemetery in April.

"We are saddened that the Ten Commandments monument has been removed from the city park in Duchesne," Summum President Su Menu said.

"Summum has never requested that religious monuments be removed from government property. We have only asked that all religions be given equal access," Menu said. "Just as the citizens of Duchesne have benefited from the display of the Decalogue, so, too, would they have benefited from the display of our Seven Aphorisms."

Members of Summum draw their inspiration from ancient Egyptian teachings and principles. Summum members have argued that monuments bearing their Seven Aphorisms should be displayed wherever the Ten Commandments are placed — citing their rights to freedom of religion and freedom of speech.

Story continues below

Summum sued Duchesne in 2003 over the city's refusal to allow the group to erect its own monument in Roy Park. One year later, the city sold the land where the Ten Commandments monument stood to the family who had originally donated the statue.

The case — and a companion case that pitted Summum against Pleasant Grove — wound its way through the federal-court system. Then on Feb. 25, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Summum's monuments do not have the same legal standing as the Ten Commandments.

Justice Samuel Alito, in the case of Pleasant Grove v. Summum, wrote that displaying the commandments is a form of "government speech" and does not follow any obligations for balanced representation of other religions.

The Supreme Court, and in turn the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, sent the Pleasant Grove case back to the federal trial court for reconsideration. The higher courts told the trial judge to examine Summum's claims against Duchesne, as well.

Barnard said Duchesne's decision to move the monument to the city cemetery meant "the underlying facts of the case changed dramatically" before a federal judge in Salt Lake City had a chance to apply the Supreme Court ruling.

"Because the Ten Commandments have been removed from the city park, the basis for Summum's lawsuit has ended," the attorney said. "The city has ceased its long-standing unfair practice of favoring one set of religious beliefs to the exclusion of others."

Recent comments

Brian is my American hero. Despite my submitting a Supreme Court...

Anonymous | June 4, 2009 at 11:59 a.m.

There is still more litigation possible, if Summum decides to pursue...

Tab L. Uno | June 3, 2009 at 1:26 p.m.

You've got "love" Brian Barnard- he's the ultimate definition of a...

Cincinnatus | June 3, 2009 at 11:16 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

3A: Juan Diego wins title

so proud of you H town boys. we cant ask for better. as for not being back...

Great pictures! I was there and got some pretty good ones, but the your...

Letters: Say heck, not gosh

Part of the point of saying "gosh" is to avoid vain repetition of the name of...

Cougars cruise to victory in Hawaii

A well deserved accomplishment for a terrific coach. And doing it in...

It's a small Mormon world

The hour is late and I'm not very bright, but I don't understand your post at...

Broncos make Aggies pay

I thought the Aggies were in the game until the end of the 2nd quarter. A...

Broncos make Aggies pay

Sorry to break the news to you, but Boise State really is not that good....

UH guard Hiram Thompson is LDS and an RM and the older brother of freshman...

as bland as wonder bread.

I agree totally with you. I've had some time in the strips and when i was at...

Advertisements