Law cut political power of UEA

Pay-deduction ban caused big drop in union's PAC activity

Published: Saturday, May 30, 2009 1:13 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

The Utah Education Association, the main public-education teacher union, was one of the most powerful and feared political groups of the 1980s and 1990s.

But conservative Republicans took aim at the group, and its political action committee, in 2001 when the Legislature adopted a law banning the automatic payroll deduction for government employees' PAC donations. Since the law's implementation, the UEA PAC activity has dropped by half.

Supporters of the ban said it was just wrong for governments to spend money, no matter how little, to help any group raise cash for political activities. "Taxpayers shouldn't be subsidizing anyone's political speech," says Royce Van Tassell, vice president of the Utah Taxpayers Association, a business-backed group that pushed for the 2001 law.

Now, with U.S. Supreme Court and a 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rulings upholding laws banning PAC payroll deductions, the UEA and other government employee unions must find other ways of collecting their political money. And it raises the question of whether those groups' political influence, especially the UEA's work in legislative elections, will wax or wane.

Story continues below

"We believe there will be a slight dip" in political contributions by member teachers, said Vik Arnold, UEA director of government relations and political action. But it will be "nothing like we saw in 2004" when the 2001 law was allowed to go into effect by federal courts while lawsuits over the payroll deduction ban moved through the judicial system.

"We'll continue to make progress in the political arena" in Utah, says Arnold, even with the payroll deduction ban. "And we'll be a player here."

But a Deseret News review of UEA PAC fundraising and spending since 2000 shows the teacher union has fallen back in collecting cash, and groups on the other side of public education issues have sprung up and surpassed it in political spending.

For example, in 2008 — which saw all 75 members of the Utah House and 15 state Senate seats up — the UEA raised $97,300, spent $178,540 on politics ($84,746 given to candidates themselves) and ended the year with $119,720 in cash.

On the other side of the aisle is Parents For Choice in Education — PCE favors private school tuition tax breaks (vouchers), the UEA opposes them. PCE in 2008 spent more than $245,000 on the elections (just over $207,000 to candidates), more than the UEA.

Further, the newspaper's analysis shows that UEA PAC spending has dropped significantly from the automatic payroll deduction days.

Recent comments

. . . every single needed, positive educational reform initiative for...

UEA has fought | June 2, 2009 at 10:54 a.m.

No Wonder Utah Finished 48th In Income.
25K Is Way Too Much Here For...

Randall | June 2, 2009 at 10:51 a.m.

To those singing the praises of unions, I will grant that much...

jefejivaro | June 2, 2009 at 9:56 a.m.

Related content
previousnext

Latest comments

Nothing proposed would keep young adults from learning of the reality of sex,...

Utes pound winless Lobos

the only "decent" team we played we lost to? I guess that Air Force isn't a...

I am watching the game again, and it is awesome!!!

Utes pound winless Lobos

I can't help but laugh inside when I read comments from YBU/TCU fans who...

(from the independant) I like Dennis Miller.... and Bill Maher, although I...

As a BYU alumnus, I can't justify to myself ever donating another dollar to...

Not a chance. Don't get me wrong they are both studs, but if Asiata wasn't...

Titan Fan, sorry that some of your best players got hurt. I hope they...

Utahns in House oppose reform bill

So sad how fear based so many are.

Will the Jazz even make the playoffs this year. The way they are playing it...

Advertisements
Advertisement