North Korea's defiant nuclear test Monday presents President Barack Obama with a challenging new set of problems on the international scene.
The test is a setback for the Obama concept of engagement with rogue nations. It vastly complicates his attempts to defuse Iran's nuclear program. Iran's leaders may reasonably conclude: If North Korea can get away with building a nuclear arsenal largely unscathed, why not us? Indeed, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was quick to rule out nuclear negotiations with other nations, declaring: "Iran's nuclear issue is over, in our opinion."
This, in turn, injects some tension into Obama's relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. After his May 18 meeting in Washington with Netanyahu, Obama said the U.S. diplomatic route to curb Iran's nuclear program would be reassessed by year's end. Netanyahu may well argue that if this timetable does not produce results, Israel is free to launch an air strike against Iran's nuclear installations.
North Korea's provocation could pose problems for U.S. relations with China, the nation most able to bring meaningful pressure to bear on the rogue nation. My sources say that even before the May 25 test, China was counseling patience to the United States. After the test, Beijing's reaction was slow and soft, though more pointed than its earlier rhetoric.
China is disinclined to consider drastic steps that the United States might suggest. One such step would be to cut off China's critical oil supply to North Korea. Though the Obama administration might hope for tougher Chinese action against North Korea, it will have to tread carefully, since the United States has been wooing China, both as an emerging superpower and the holder of much of America's debt.
On April 5, in defiance of a United Nations Security Council resolution, North Korea test-fired a long-range missile. The council rebuked the Pyongyang regime, which reacted angrily. It said it was terminating its participation in six-nation talks (with the United States, Russia, China, Japan, South Korea) on its nuclear program. It demanded an apology from the U.N., which was not forthcoming. Thus came this latest test (followed by further missile firings), which the Security Council branded a "clear violation" of international law.
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Millennial...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of marriage
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- Letter: Job creation should be a top...
- Kathleen Parker: In politics, honesty and...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- U.S. is moving toward the same fate as...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
50 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
45 - It's déjà vu all over again...
34 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
30 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
29 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
22 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
19 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments