Title IX is at it again with sand volleyball

Published: Wednesday, May 6, 2009 12:13 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

Congratulations to the NCAA for making beach volleyball an official collegiate sport — for women.

Just what we need: another sport that is not sponsored by high schools and is played largely by people who have access to, oh, I don't know, a beach.

By the way, the new sport is being called "sand volleyball," because, as the NCAA explains it, not all schools have a beach.

Did you already figure out why they added the sport? Here's a hint: Title IX.

This is a transparent move to inflate the number of female athletes on college athletic rosters; apparently, the addition of those silly NCAA-sponsored crew teams didn't do the trick. Or didn't you wonder why sand/beach volleyball is being offered, as proudly explained by the NCAA, FOR WOMEN ONLY.

Next stop: Women's hop scotch and jump roping teams.

Well, we've been down this Title IX road before, haven't we. A little background: In 1979, the Office of Civil Rights interpreted the four-year-old Title IX law to mean strict proportionality — in other words, if a school's enrollment was 51 percent women and 49 percent men, then athletic scholarships and spending should be exactly the same.

Story continues below

That sounds good in theory, except that men tend to be more interested in sports than women the same way more women are drawn to dance than men (as a high school track coach for almost 20 years, I can tell you this is true); consistent with that, the original Title IX law that was passed in 1975 required that schools examine "whether the selection of sports and levels of competition effectively accommodate the interests and abilities of members of both sexes."

Furthermore, it states the law should not "be interpreted to require any education institution to grant preferential or disparate treatment to one sex on account of an imbalance which may exist" in the numbers of each sex participating in a sport.

But that is exactly what has happened, as we all know. It's become a quota system. Because football, with its 100-man roster, creates an imbalance in the proportionality (there is no corresponding women's football team, of course), hundreds of men's wrestling, soccer, track and cross country teams have been eliminated while hundreds of women's sports have been added.

Excluding football, there are more female athletes than male athletes, even though this does not reflect "interest." Boy participants in high school athletics outnumber girl participants in Utah in track, wrestling, soccer and basketball. The same is true on the national level.

Recent comments

I love how most proponents of Title IX are so quick to point out how...

John | May 13, 2009 at 5:23 p.m.

I realize I am biased because I was a female college athlete;...

Cry Babies! | May 11, 2009 at 10:42 a.m.

Re: Awesomeron: Not that much I admit, but I am learning more and...

awesomeron | May 10, 2009 at 6:14 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Hall's legacy measured today

Can someone please tell me which top 10 team Max has won? I hope the Jeff...

Obama and GOP differ over job aid

The old recipie for good economy is to just cut taxes to spur investment and...

Letters: Respectful gesture

Respect? Why show respect for another human being who's opinions and...

The problem is, Sarah Palin ist not a competent politician. She begs to be...

BYU's old uniforms?

Please do tell which of his facts were stupid? Your best ever got smocked at...

Korver's return hits snag

Honestly. Kyle cannot be moved with the contract. I would rather see CJ<...

So many conclusions, based on false assumptions, so many haters, with...

Jazz share in win over Bulls

If Carlos continues to play like this instead of hearing "boo" at ESA, maybe...

BYU's old uniforms?

With all that tradition they can't seem to compete on the national stage....

A.I. return would not surprise

Hint: You notice (like I predicted) no mention of any Jazz interest in...

Advertisements