Shift to green power will require a revolution

Published: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:10 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

There I was, burning carbon like a woman possessed — the furnace humming, a load of laundry running in the washer and dryer and the Utah Jazz-Phoenix Suns game on the flat-screen television.

Then, the buzz kill.

"Why haven't you turned the lights off?" implored my breathless 17-year-old daughter, Liz.

"Why?" I replied.

"It's Earth Hour. We're all supposed to turn off our lights. It's about global warming."

Loosely paraphrasing Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Thomas Friedman, I responded, "This is a green party, not a green revolution."

"I'll get on board when we do something serious about it."

I fell asleep shortly after that exchange Saturday. I slept right through Earth Hour. I even missed the overtime of the Jazz game.

Elsewhere, people got on board in a big way. From Salt Lake City's Temple to Rome's Colosseum, icons worldwide dimmed their lights in observance of Earth Hour. The World Wildlife Fund had urged governments, businesses and households to revert to candle power for at least 60 minutes starting at 8:30 p.m., wherever they were, to highlight the threat of climate change.

These events are good in terms of awareness. But I kept flashing back on Friedman's recent lecture at Abravanel Hall, where he talked in terms of a "green revolution" as opposed to a "green party."

Story continues below

"Have you ever been to a revolution where nobody got hurt?" he asked the sold-out crowd of 3,000 people?

That's the point, isn't it? I should be paying until it hurts for all of my creature comforts. Only then will I get serious about changing my habits.

It took $4-per-gallon gasoline to get me out of my car and onto public transportation. I haven't ridden the bus or train since gas prices dropped, although breaking my foot, undergoing major surgery and the unavailability of the park-and-ride lot near my house (currently under construction) have been factors, too. I'd like to think I'll get back to it once the weather improves, but we'll see. It has to make sense economically and in terms of my schedule.

I will say, though, that I did feel a sense of economic and environmental virtue while riding the bus and train. It made sense on a lot of levels. And there was room for many more people, should they want to do the same.

I'm in full agreement with much of what Friedman espouses about our planet's future. But I am not sure how we get there in a country in which special interests have such a chokehold on our government, let alone 306 million people who really enjoy their personal computers, flat-screen televisions, central heating and cooling systems and dirt-cheap electricity. They consider driving a car their birthright.

Recent comments

A shift to green power will require more resources that the world...

Al Knowing | March 31, 2009 at 10:00 p.m.

What war over Uranium? The US and Canada have a couple centuries'...

Factmonger | March 31, 2009 at 6:19 p.m.

No one ever talks about the costs of going green. All I hear are the...

Chad | March 31, 2009 at 3:31 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

the price on these ugly antique contraptions. No word on that in this...

I'm telling you, poor USU fans really have a complex when it comes to BYU....

Letters: Illegal and law abiding?

It's really not that difficult to understand unless you're being deliberately...

Could not agree more with Todd and his rants on Sloan. This team seems to...

I encountered some of these sheep dogs this summer, by Joes Valley. I had no...

This inclusion explains your irrational bias. BYU is anything but liberal;...

By the way, The recent survey Poll in Utah says almost nothing, but one...

This is ridiculous. 43% of the people Actually support REQUIRING people to...

How true!! There is a gap and there is also a challenge to live like we should.

Interesting. A bill where Utahns agree with the major elements, but not the...

Advertisements