Guv vetoes video-game bill

Agreeing with freedom-of-speech proponents and video gamers, including one group formed by artists, moviemakers and writers, Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. vetoed a video-game truth-in-advertising bill Wednesday.

He also vetoed a more obscure bill (HB156) that could cause sewage and water problems on poorly subdivided agricultural lands.

But the HB353 veto clearly puts Huntsman in the sights of some conservative Utah Republicans, who were already upset with him over his support of the Common Ground Initiative, several bills that were supported by gay-rights groups and quickly killed in the 2009 Legislature.

"We believe there are commerce-clause and First-Amendment issues" with HB353, said Lisa Roskelley, Huntsman's spokeswoman. "It is a laudable goal to protect children from inappropriate materials, but the governor is concerned that this bill doesn't do that."

Those claims were denied by House GOP leaders and Rep. Mike Morley, R-Spanish Fork, the bill's sponsor, who said they were surprised and displeased with the governor's veto — the first this year among 450 bills passed by the 2009 Legislature.

Huntsman's veto of HB353, his "green agenda" and his support of the Common Ground Initiative "certainly give the impression that he is out of touch with mainstream Utah," said Morley, a noted House conservative. "He's a moderate, not a conservative. And his recent actions don't seem to square with the majority in the Legislature, either."

Morley said he found out that his bill would be vetoed through a voice message from a Huntsman aide left Wednesday afternoon. "It's too bad I couldn't talk to him. His reasons" for the veto in a veto letter "are not correct," Morley said.

House Majority Leader Kevin Garn, R-Layton, said HB353 was a "good" bill aimed at keeping video games with violence and nudity away from children.

Huntsman may not be through with his vetoes. He has until April 1 to sign, veto or allow bills to become law without his signature.

While displeased with the veto, Garn said: "I don't see a veto override session called for either of these bills. I think the sponsors should retool them and present them next session."