A room at the Statehouse is filled with gay marriage opponents in Montpelier, Vt., Monday. Hundreds of gay marriage opponents have converged on the Vermont Statehouse to lobby lawmakers as the Legislature opens a week's worth of hearings on a same-sex marriage bill.
Toby Talbot, Associated Press
MONTPELIER, Vt. — Nine years after it played host to a bitter fight over civil unions, Vermont's Statehouse is again a gay rights battleground.
More than 200 same-sex marriage opponents, cheering and wearing buttons that read "Marriage — A Mother & Father for Every Child," converged Monday on Montpelier as lawmakers began a week's worth of hearings on a bill that would allow gay and lesbian couples to marry.
If approved, Vermont would join Massachusetts and Connecticut as the only U.S. states that allow gay marriage.
The measure would replace Vermont's first-in-the-nation civil unions law with one that allows marriage of same-sex partners beginning Sept. 1. Civil unions, which confer some rights similar to marriage, would still be recognized but no longer granted after Sept. 1.
Supporters cast the debate as a civil rights issue, saying a civil unions law enacted by the state in 2000 has fallen short of the equality it promised same-sex couples. Its appeal has declined, too: In 2001, the state granted 1,876 civil unions, compared with only 262 last year.
Passing a gay marriage bill "is one of the most important civil rights issues of our time," said Greg Johnson, a Vermont Law School professor who testified before the state Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday.
While the bill won't guarantee federal benefits, supporters say it would provide societal recognition, improve access to health benefits and eliminate one of two obstacles to federal protections such as Social Security survivor benefits.
Opponents say gay marriage would undermine traditional male-female marriage, rendering men and women interchangeable and destroying the connection between children and marriage. They want the question put to voters in a referendum.
Legislative leaders announced two weeks ago that they intended to pass the bill — titled "An act relating to civil marriage" — before adjourning in May, and they have scheduled hearings to get testimony on the legal, social and practical implications of it.
A public hearing is scheduled for Wednesday night at the Capitol, which was the epicenter of the fight in 2000, when the issue divided Vermont and partisans endured hate mail, threatening telephone messages and tense public meetings.
More than a dozen lawmakers who voted for civil unions lost their seats in the ensuing election.
- Glenn Beck: Living large in Texas, and richer...
- Mitt Romney ready to claim GOP nomination...
- Mitt Romney promises world's strongest...
- Mitt Romney to clinch GOP nomination with...
- Portland man choreographs elaborate proposal,...
- New approach tested for high blood pressure
- Studies try to find why poorer people are...
- Olympic hurdler Lolo Jones says she's a...
- Glenn Beck: Living large in Texas, and...
60 - News analysis: From confidence to...
56 - Mitt Romney promises world's strongest...
34 - Maine churches fighting gay marriage
29 - Studies try to find why poorer people...
27 - Can U.S. schools adopt education...
26 - Sarah Palin catches flak over her Orrin...
24 - The price of freedom: Nearly half of...
22






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments