Utah's highly effective anti-tobacco effort is not funded by the state's general fund. Rather, it is paid for primarily by the Master Settlement Agreement, a settlement with tobacco companies intended to compensate states for the costs of tobacco addiction. HB444 would take funding away from tobacco prevention and control, effectively gutting the program.
In economically challenged times, Utah cannot afford to misuse tobacco-settlement funds. The crushing financial burden each state must carry to address the very real costs associated with tobacco-related death and disease will only diminish when smoking rates begin to decline. Don't cut a program that works. Utah's fight against the tobacco industry must continue.
Chip Haskell
Salt Lake City
What You May Have Missed
Most Popular
Across Site
In Opinion
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of marriage
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Millennial...
- Kathleen Parker: In politics, honesty and...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Letter: Job creation should be a top...
Most Commented
Across Site
In Opinion
- My view: Adjusting the definition of...
48 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
44 - It's déjà vu all over again...
34 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
29 - Letter: Job creation should be a top...
24 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
22 - Letter: Citizens must overlook emotions...
19 - Hatch's debating 'issue' is manufactured
13






DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments