Burress told police he wasn't in 2005 shooting

Published: Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2009 3:17 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
LEBANON, Pa. — Plaxico Burress told police that he had no knowledge of a 2005 shooting incident in the Bronx in which two people were seen firing rounds from a sport-utility truck the New York Giants star borrowed from a dealer.

The oft-troubled New York Giants receiver ended up in a lawsuit over the truck, as a Lebanon, Pa., dealer sued Burress for damaging the 2004 Chevrolet Avalanche and failing to return it.

A civil trial began Wednesday afternoon in Pennsylvania. Burress and the car dealer, Frederick Laurenzo, gave conflicting accounts during the first 90 minutes of testimony. Laurenzo said he spoke by telephone to Burress and the agent, Robert Bailey, and had a verbal agreement about the details of the deal, in which Burress was to make promotional appearances for the dealership and was not to let anybody else drive the car.

Burress said he simply asked his agent to get a car for him and that he never spoke to Laurenzo about any conditions.

There was no mention during the initial testimony about how the truck ended up in the midst of a shooting incident in New York City.

According to New York police, officers saw two men firing off rounds from inside the truck on a Bronx street early on Aug. 20, 2005. It did not, however, appear that they were targeting anyone, police said.

Story continues below
Officers recovered two 9-mm pistols at the scene and arrested two people, one of them a cousin of Burress, police said.

Investigators contacted Burress, who came in with a lawyer more than two weeks later for questioning. Burress signed a statement saying he had loaned the car to a cousin, but that he had no knowledge of the incident and was at practice at the time of the shooting.

Burress' attorney Benjamin Brafman says he was told that at the time of the incident Burress was with the team at a New Jersey hotel because the Giants had a home preseason game later that day.

Giants spokesman Pat Hanlon declined to discuss Burress' exact whereabouts at the time of the shooting.

Charges against Burress' cousin were dropped. The other person in the car pleaded guilty in March 2006 to criminal possession of a weapon, police said.

Police said they released the car to the dealer in January 2007.

Laurenzo said the vehicle was worth more than $36,000, but he loaned it to Burress because the NFL star agreed to sign autographs at promotional events.

Laurenzo filed a civil complaint in September 2006 seeking restitution and accusing Burress of breach of contract because he never showed up to sign autographs and let someone else drive the vehicle. Laurenzo also said Burress made no effort to help him get the damaged vehicle back.

Comments

You can be the first to comment on this story.

previousnext

Latest comments

How is non-discrimination a bad move? Can you explain that to me? Wouldn't...

Anything that promotes homosexuality in our community is wrong, including...

One question. If these bills are so good, why has congress optied out of it?...

I can understand that concern for a couple reasons. A landlord over multiple...

If the Republicans are voting for Healthcare bills to die, what is their...

4A preview: Springville vs. Dixie

Dixie is the best team in the state hands down. TV/MC dont stand a chance...

Mega wind project goes online

How much was paid by subsidies? What is the cost of the power? What is the...

I was in the Hill Cumorah Pageant cast this summer. Two days after Ben's...

Dixie St. campus briefs

Congratulations, ladies, on a great accomplishment! Only your second year...

How to reduce the budget; and not on creative ways to raise more taxes. ...

Advertisements
Advertisement