ACC commish says BCS complies with law

Published: Thursday, Jan. 8, 2009 1:20 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Bowl Championship Series officials believe they're prepared to fend off any legal challenges.

With the Utah attorney general investigating the bowl system for a possible antitrust violation, Atlantic Coast Conference commissioner and BCS coordinator John Swofford said the BCS has carefully considered the legality of its format.

"We've attempted to make every effort to make certain that any structure of the BCS is within the antitrust laws. Our legal people are comfortable that the BCS structure is," Swofford said during a Football Writers of American Association meeting. "Obviously if there are any aspects of it that we should be doing differently, we would adjust that."

Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff announced his investigation Tuesday. Utah (13-0) was the only unbeaten school in major college football yet was left out of Thursday night's BCS title game between Florida and Oklahoma, each with one loss.

"We're not out there trying to test the antitrust laws of the United States of America," Swofford said.

Swofford reiterated that the majority of university presidents and athletic directors oppose an expansive NFL-style playoff for major college football.

Story continues below
Last summer, the BCS considered a proposal by Southeastern Conference commissioner Mike Slive to change to a four-team playoff called the plus-one model. The format would match the top four teams at the end of the regular season in two of the major bowls and the winners would play in the national title game.

That proposal was shot down. Swofford said it's unlikely the plus-one model will be considered again any time soon.

Utah finished its perfect season last week with a 31-17 victory against Alabama in the Sugar Bowl. While the Utes still have a slim chance of being voted No. 1 in the final AP Top 25, the BCS national championship trophy and No. 1 spot in the final USA Today coaches' poll goes to the winner of Thursday night's game in Miami.

"The BCS provided a platform for Utah to show the nation what a terrific football they had this year." Swofford said. "Preceding the BCS, I don't know if that platform would have been there."

The BCS expanded to five games three seasons ago and changed its qualification standards to allow better access to teams from the five conferences without automatic bids, such as Utah, which plays in the Mountain West Conference.

"The non-AQ conferences have greater access to the top-level bowls than ever in history because of the BCS," Swofford said.

Recent comments

Concerning the strength of schedule clown, let's talk. First the Utes...

Lindy | Jan. 9, 2009 at 5:50 p.m.

The BCS. like many of the comments already made needs to be done away...

BCS Nonsupporter | Jan. 9, 2009 at 12:33 p.m.

The ACC commissioner likes the BCS because his schools benefit even...

It's about money and publicity | Jan. 9, 2009 at 9:12 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

watch out for next year for sure, the negatives are just closet (and...

And something else, I generally follow players from the state schools when...

I could care less that Max Hall said what he did. The feeling is mutual BYU...

BYU is champion of the state

Dear Max, probably could have done without that comment. Probably would've...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

As a Utah fan, let me first say congratulations to Max Hall, the Cougars, and...

Geno's and Pat's are good.. but, they are mostly for tourists, the real...

Hall mouths off about hate of Utah

(You even got a middle initial... how's that for 'ya Max) It's nice to see...

Air Up There, The

Even today, I still cannot get enough of this movie or Charles Gitonga Maina....

Cougars beat Utes in overtime

...disappointed with Max Hall's comments that he hates everything about UofU....

Over the last few days I read comments of people complaining about tasteless...

Advertisements