Hatch helps bring D.C.-Utah House seat bill to Senate floor

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2009 11:02 p.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
As Congress convened Tuesday, one of the first bills introduced would give the heavily Democratic District of Columbia a U.S. House seat with full voting rights — counterbalanced by giving a fourth House seat to heavily Republican Utah.

Sponsors — including Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah — predict quick passage into law because after the last election, Republicans who had fought it no longer have enough votes in the Senate to sustain a filibuster against it. But the bill also set off a spat between Hatch and brand new freshman Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, who says it is unconstitutional.

Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's nonvoting delegate in the House, said, "We have every reason to believe that we will have the support this year of both house of Congress (with new larger Democratic majorities) and the new president." In fact, Barack Obama was a co-sponsor of the bill in the Senate last year, and the Democratic platform also supports the bill.

She said that with the help of Hatch and Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., the bill's Senate sponsor, "We will see a history making, bipartisan increase in democracy for two jurisdictions and for our country."

Story continues below
She and some civil rights groups have suggested that the House should vote on the bill on Feb. 12, Abraham Lincoln's 200th birthday, as a symbolic time to grant D.C. residents "the equal voting rights they have been denied for more than 200 years."

Lieberman added on Tuesday, "The righting of this historic wrong is long overdue. ... Men and women of the District have fought bravely in our wars, many giving their lives in defense of our country, yet they have no vote on the serious questions of war and peace."

Hatch said, "The bill moves Utah closer to receiving the additional House seat it has has deserved for nearly a decade."

The bill would expand the number of House seats from 435 to 437, giving one to D.C. and one to Utah. If Utah had had an extra 80 people in the 2000 Census, it would have won a fourth House seat. Instead, the last available seat went to North Carolina.

Hatch said, "While the 2010 Census and reapportionment might provide Utah an additional seat, the failure of the 2000 process showed that this is not a sure thing. This bill maximizes the chances of securing an additional seat for Utah, which has had one of the country's fastest growing rates since the last Census."

But Chaffetz has vowed to oppose the bill and criticized Hatch for helping to introduce it on Tuesday.

Recent comments

You commenters don't understand the political power of an additional...

You all are nuts!! | Jan. 7, 2009 at 5:37 p.m.

You don't have to be a lawyer to understand the Constitution. You...

Mike R. | Jan. 7, 2009 at 2:18 p.m.

I wonder if it were now 2012 (Utah would already have it's fourth...

Just a Question for Orrin | Jan. 7, 2009 at 1:50 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Letters: Sales tax unfair

It is easy to tell the difference between a "fair tax" and an unfair tax. A...

Just as the liberals will never stop, I will never stop affirming my...

We have a point guard and a very good back up power forward (Millsap). Our...

Laws regarding marriage.... | 12:39 p.m. Nov. 12, 2009 "...are the same for...

Letters: Show true support

The difference is huge because a vote authorizing the President to go to war...

Letters: Trash or truth?

Demo Dave | 11:28 a.m. If you listened to the shows you complain about you...

These are not MC fans, they have to be TV trying to get everyone relied up....

Any elected official who supports said measures will not get my vote. This...

I'm still not clear on if we are discussing another "urban myth" or if there...

Tavernari has matured

I'm thinking Tavi is open right now....and he should shoot it!

Advertisements
Advertisement