From Deseret News archives:

Give juries final say

Published: Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2009 12:05 a.m. MST
PRINT | FONT + - 

Spencer Robinson (Readers' Forum, Jan. 4) really has things upside down; his hypothetical defendant could always ask for a non-jury trial. Not only should juries have the final say, but they should have it as to the law as well as to the facts. The Founding Fathers considered juries a cornerstone of justice, a constitutional protection against lawyers, judges and legalized corruption. That juries should be 12 stooges required to adhere to every utterance of black-robed lawyers is a relatively recent phenomenon in the judicial march to power.

There probably has not been a trial by citizen peers in the last 50 years. Legal distortions and technical games extend trials ad nauseam until most won't even show up for selection; juries have almost been destroyed by voir dire and the peremptory challenge.

Who can remember when 12 everyday Americans were last seated on a jury panel?

Paul Sharp

Salt Lake City

About this ad

View Comments

DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.

– About Comments

rss icon

Recommended in Opinion

Story

The NRC turned heads this week by approving licenses for two new nuclear power reactors in Georgia.

Story

With Rick Santorum's showing last week, people are again talking about a "brokered convention."

Story

Social issues of religious liberty, conscience and the definition of marriage have returned to public debate.