WASHINGTON — In handling questions about the arrest of Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich — for allegedly trying to sell President-elect Barack Obama's Senate seat to the highest bidder — Obama has gone strictly by the book. His statements have been cautious and precise, careful not to get ahead of the facts or make declarations that might later have to be retracted.
For most politicians, that would be good enough. For Obama, who inspired the nation with a promise of "change we can believe in," it's not.
The scandal involves Obama only in the most tangential way, as far as anyone knows, and actually seems to cast him in a favorable light. But the longer he leaves obvious questions unanswered, the longer the president-elect will have to talk about the seamier side of Illinois politics rather than initiatives such as saving the U.S. auto industry or revamping health care.
The FBI affidavit underlying the criminal complaint against Blagojevich reads like the amateurish script of a movie about a tough-guy politician on the make. According to the affidavit, court-ordered wiretaps overheard Blagojevich and his associates concocting various schemes to profit from his authority, as governor, to appoint someone to fill the Senate seat that Obama has vacated. At one point, Blagojevich is quoted as telling an adviser: "I've got this thing and it's (expletive) golden, and, uh, uh, I'm just not giving it up for (expletive) nothing. I'm not gonna do it." If he can't get what he wants from leveraging the Senate seat, Blagojevich says, he might just appoint himself.
What he wants, according to the affidavit, is to make his family financially secure by obtaining a job for his wife or for himself after leaving office. The governor was also aware that he was already under federal investigation for alleged corruption, although this knowledge doesn't seem to have induced an iota of discretion. The affidavit quotes Blagojevich as listing three criteria for picking Obama's successor: "our legal situation, our personal situation, my political situation." So much for details such as the candidates' qualifications.
He delivers an expletive-laden tirade against Obama, according to the court papers, because he believes Obama wants him to give the job to a specific candidate "for nothing." This actually makes the president-elect and his team look good — but also raises a host of questions that need to be answered.
Obama has denied speaking to Blagojevich about the Senate seat. But Obama's initial statement seemed crafted to avoid the question of whether his aides had been in touch with the governor's office. On Thursday, at a news conference, he said he was certain his people "had no involvement with any dealmaking," and added that his staff was still "gathering facts" about possible contacts
- Robert J. Samuelson: Rethink the notion that...
- In our opinion: Editorial: Underwater...
- My view: Adjusting the definition of marriage
- Frank Pignanelli & LaVarr Webb: The pros and...
- Would repossessing federal lands help fund...
- Kathleen Parker: In politics, honesty and...
- Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
- Robert Bennett: How I came to write a weekly...
- Letter: Lee's financial bungle reflects...
37 - Readers' forum: 'Obamacares'
36 - It's déjà vu all over again...
33 - My view: Adjusting the definition of...
26 - Would repossessing federal lands help...
22 - Obama and Romney should speak truth on...
21 - Letter: Remember, Howell is still in...
21 - Kathleen Parker: Obnoxious attempt to...
19







DeseretNews.com encourages a civil dialogue among its readers. We welcome your thoughtful comments.
— About comments