Big winners in U.S. House races raised big bucks

Published: Friday, Dec. 5, 2008 12:41 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Jim Matheson, Jason Chaffetz and Rob Bishop not only won their U.S. House races this year, they raised so much money in the process that they have huge financial head starts for their next races.

While Matheson, D-Utah, spent $1.4 million on his race this year, he finished with an extra, massive $727,000 in the bank, according to the post-election disclosure forms he filed with the Federal Election Commission on Thursday.

Rep.-elect Chaffetz spent $378,500 en route to ousting Rep. Chris Cannon in the Republican primary and Democrat Bennion Spencer in the general election, but finished with no debt and a healthy $54,000 in the bank.

Aides to Bishop said he was not expected to file his disclosure form until after press deadlines Thursday night. But his filings before the election showed that he then had cash on hand amounting to $167,464 but had unpaid bills of about $50,000. With that, he should also have a healthy financial head start on future opponents.

Matheson — who raised and spent more than all other congressional candidates in Utah combined this year — said, "It clearly helps to start with money already in the bank."

Story continues below
In fact, he had more money left over ($726,910) than his GOP challenger Bill Dew spent in his entire campaign ($610,695) — and Dew was able to spend that much only because he personally loaned his campaign $570,000.

Having such a big head start could scare off many challengers unless they are millionaires like Dew who can largely self-fund their races.

But Matheson said, "That doesn't mean I will let up on fundraising." He said he will begin raising funds for the next race almost immediately.

Similarly, Chaffetz also said he will not stand pat with the $54,288 he has in the bank. "We'll get after it (fundraising) in January. We're only 15 months away from the next caucus meetings, so you have to run perpetually, unfortunately. It's not my first choice, but it is reality," he said.

Chaffetz did show that massive amounts of money are not necessarily required to beat an incumbent. He had spent only about $100,000 through the primary and beat Cannon, who had spent $667,000 through that time.

For the entire campaign, Chaffetz spent $378,423 and raised $442,241 (without needing to put in any of his own money).

"My wife and I were committed to remain debt free, and we did. We still spent only about half (in the entire campaign) than what Mr. Cannon did (in just the primary)," Chaffetz said. "I said at the very beginning that my No. 1 issue was fiscal discipline," and he said his spending proves he is fiscally conservative.

Recent comments

Jason ran an impressive campaign - the fact that he ran a successful...

Mom to Many | Dec. 5, 2008 at 5:50 p.m.

I was under the impression that Jason Chaffetz spent $100,000 to get...

arc | Dec. 5, 2008 at 7:21 a.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

USA Today poll: U. 14th, Y. 22nd

are overrated teams who play NOBODY and when they do play a good team they...

Polygamy was condemned in the BOM, but was said to be ok at special times....

"Hey Annoy monous" When the Cougs win like this, why be such a jerk -...

Utahns have good reason t be depressed if your team can't beat the Kings.

Editorial: 'Immigrant' children needy

How does providing health care for all interfere with opportunity or freedom?...

House passes health care bill

Crap. I moved to the US from Canada because it is almost impossible to get...

No Don, there are many posters against gay marriage. Either you're not...

Water wars in Snake Valley

"the water authority retorts that it has a duty to find water in its state...

Thanks again Jim Matheson. I called your office several times as I was...

if we can get the senate on board and President Obama will sign it. ...

Advertisements
Advertisement