From Deseret News archives:

Cell-phone driving risks affirmed

U. study equates their use with drunken driving

Published: Monday, Dec. 1, 2008 12:08 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The differences are apparent at the operational, tactical and strategic levels of performance, the researchers state. The study, which was done in a sophisticated driving simulator, not on the street, analyzed the driving performance of 41 mostly young adult drivers paired with 41 friends who served as conversation partners. Both sexes were equally represented.

In each of three experimental conditions (conversation with hands-free cell phone, conversation in the car, or no conversation), one person in each pair was randomly selected to be the "driver" and the other the conversation partner.

Drivers and partners spent 10 minutes on a 24-mile multilane highway with onramps and offramps, overpasses and two-lane traffic in each direction. Participants drove under an irregular-flow condition that mimics real highway conditions, with other vehicles, in compliance with traffic laws, changing lanes and speeds. This context required "drivers" to pay attention to surrounding traffic. Partners were told to tell each other a previously undisclosed "close call" story about a time their lives were threatened.

Results show the cell-phone users were more likely to drift past their lane boundaries, kept increasing following distance and were four times more likely to miss pulling off the highway at the designated offramp. Passenger conversation barely affected all three measures.

Story continues below
Problems could have stemmed from inattention "blindness" or insufficient processing of information from the driving environment. Cell-phone users may also find it more difficult to hold the thought to exit at the designated ramp.

The more complicated the task, the more drivers appeared to modulate the complexity of their speech, as measured by syllables per word. Drivers also talked more when using cell phones, the authors suggest, because perhaps they were trying to control the conversation to avoid using the mental resources required to really listen to the other person.


E-mail: jthalman@desnews.com; wleonard@desnews.com

Recent comments

Every state allows an individual to drive after having a beer or two...

Thoughts | Dec. 1, 2008 at 5:14 p.m.

Some of you road delinquents with cell phones in hand need to stop...

Just A Little Respect | Dec. 1, 2008 at 1:37 p.m.

Correlation is not Causation, this study is in no way broad enough to...

Hah! | Dec. 1, 2008 at 1:15 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Editorial: 10 years of TRAX

Sorry earlier I meant to say that tracks seems to travel at 35 miles an hour...

'Peter Frumhoff, the director of science and policy at the Union of...

The Non-BCS crowd ought to create their own title game...their own brand, and...

Letters: Democrats' ethics

That's the whole of your defense of GOP resistance to badly-needed ethics...

Your criticism should hardly be focused on Bennett alone. What about all the...

'Wired's Threat Level blog reported on November 20 that Gavin Schmidt, a...

The reality of climate change is supported by multiple lines of evidence and...

BYU professor remembered

I had the priviledge of staying in the LeBaron home on severl occasions as I...

Letters: Growing jobless rate

So the unemployment rate has dropped to "just" 10%, huh? I wonder what that...

Ahh for the love of money...what money can buy!!!

Advertisements