From Deseret News archives:

If you don't win, it doesn't mean your rights have been trampled on

Published: Thursday, Nov. 20, 2008 12:24 a.m. MST
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 

Among the many new "rights" being conjured out of thin air, a new one seems to be a "right" to win.

Americans have long had the right to put their candidates and their ideas to a vote. Now there seems to be a sense that your rights have been trampled on if you don't win.

Hillary Clinton's supporters were not merely disappointed, but outraged, when she lost the Democrats' nomination to Barack Obama. Some took it as a sign that, while racial barriers had come down, the "glass ceiling" holding down women was still in place.

Apparently, if you don't win, somebody has put up a barrier or a ceiling. The more obvious explanation of the nomination outcome was that Obama ran a better campaign than Clinton. There is not the slightest reason to doubt that she would have been the nominee if the votes in the primaries had come out her way.

As the election approached, pundits warned that, if Obama lost, there would be riots in the ghetto. We will never know. But since when does any candidate have a right to win any office, much less the White House?

Story continues below

The worst of all the reactions from people who act as if they have a right to win have come from gay activists in the wake of voter rejection of so-called "gay marriage," which is to say, redefining what marriage has meant for centuries.

Blacks and Mormons have been the main targets of the gay activists' anger. Seventy percent of blacks voted against gay marriage in California, so racial epithets were hurled at blacks in Los Angeles — not in black neighborhoods, by the way.

Blacks who just happened to be driving through Westwood, near UCLA, were accosted in their cars and, in addition to being denounced, were warned, "You better watch your back."

Even blacks who were carrying signs in favor of gay marriage were denounced with racial epithets.

In Michigan, an evangelical church service was invaded and disrupted by gay activists, who also set off a fire alarm, because evangelicals had dared to exercise their right to express their opinions at the polls.

In Oakland, Calif., a mob gathered outside a Mormon temple in such numbers that officials shut down a nearby freeway exit for more than three hours.

In their midst was a San Francisco supervisor who said "The Mormon church has had to rely on our tolerance in the past, to be able to express their beliefs." He added, "This is a huge mistake for them. It looks like they've forgotten some lessons."

Apparently Mormons don't have the same rights as other Americans, at least not if they don't vote the way gay activists want them to vote.

There was another gay activist mob gathered outside a Mormon temple in Orange County, Calif.

Recent comments

Yet again, Dr. Sowell correctly assesses and articulates the essence...

samhill | Nov. 20, 2008 at 10:32 p.m.

This is a great article, and to read the comments of those who "lost"...

rasjr | Nov. 20, 2008 at 7:19 p.m.

Once again, many people have forgotten that marriage is not a right,...

Dan M | Nov. 20, 2008 at 5:05 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

What is a Zoobie? Is it suppose to be funny or are you trying to compare us...

Brad Rock: Rock on ...

Is Ari Fleisher really going to be the apologist for the BCS? Sounds more...

No doubt Majerus is a great coach and did great things here. Nonetheless he...

Take it from someone who knows. It destory you and those around you.

Williams' late jumper tops Spurs

Yes it would be a great trade for Utah. But I doubt Toronto would consider...

"Here, as everywhere else in the world, transit is subsidized so that the...

Dear Who cares? | 12:35 p.m. Dec. 8, 2009, Your apathy toward global sport...

Ronnie Price must have the worst sprained toe in the history of toes. I...

yea when was the last time CJ held Ginobli to 5 points for the game? who...

I didnt know you personally but I know someone who did. We really all do...

Advertisements