Jury out in Griffin murder trial

Published: Friday, Nov. 14 2008 12:00 a.m. MST

Glenn Howard Griffin, left, talks with his attorney, Randall Richards, during a recess in 1st District Court in Logan on Thursday.

Eli Lucero, Associated Press

Enlarge photo»

LOGAN — The jury is out in the cold-case murder trial of Glenn Howard Griffin.

The prosecution and defense wrapped up closing arguments Thursday in a capital murder case that, while it may have begun last month, has lingered for more than two decades without closure.

Jurors deliberated until late into the evening and had not reached a verdict at press time.

Much of Griffin's fate hangs on the credibility of two then-college students' memories, the viability of DNA evidence tapped from a bloody dollar bill and how much to trust the word of a jailhouse rapist who said he heard Griffin's confession.

What verdict is returned, too, will decide if the questions asked about the last minutes of young Bradley Newell Perry's life at a roadside gas station finally have an answer, or if they are to continue unheeded.

Defense attorney Randall Richards said the case from the outset has had plenty of room for reasonable doubt.

The two former Utah State University students who were waited on at the family gas station shortly after or during Perry's murder have had 24 years to forget — or imagine — much about the man they met at the gas pumps that morning, he said.

"As we age we have gaps in our memories and our beautiful mind wants to fill those gaps with other things."

Richards pointed out that the suspect sketch in Perry's slaying drawn by one of the students showed a man without glasses. Griffin, his mother testified earlier in the trial, has worn glasses since age 5 — an accessory that made such a dramatic difference in his life that he told his mother he was unaware his neighbors had trees before he put them on.

Prosecutor Brad Smith, in rebuttal, told jurors the face on the sketch was that of a man who had just committed a murder and the glasses were most likely shed in the throes of a life-and-death struggle.

Richards also pointed to the questionable caretaking of forensic evidence over two decades and how — despite what evidence did exist — the fingerprints found at the scene of the crime were not those of his client.

And while there was DNA found on the dollar bill that prosecutors say matches that of Griffin's, Richards questioned the DNA methodology and pointed out there was no blood found on any of the murder weapons that pointed to Griffin.

Additionally, he said the inmate who said he overheard words spoken by Griffin that amounted to a "tantamount" confession were words from a "morally bankrupt" man.

Get The Deseret News Everywhere

Subscribe

Mobile

RSS