Deseret News political columnists LaVarr Webb and Frank Pignanelli watched and judged Friday night's presidential faceoff between Sens. John McCain and Barack Obama. Here's what they saw through partisan eyes:

The economy

Webb: It was close, with a slight edge to McCain. McCain turned the discussion into a forum on earmarks and budget cuts, while Obama tried to be more populist. McCain should have taken better advantage of the fact that he has been in the thick of the negotiations on the bailout, while Obama has been on the sidelines. McCain came through as more of a fighter against government waste.

Pignanelli: Obama detailed his conditions for the rescue package. Further, he clearly appealed to middle-income families, while McCain's constant references to controlling spending was admirable but overly technical. Obama best conveyed a domestic economic plan.

Foreign policy

Pignanelli: McCain obviously has experience in this area, but wasted time attacking Obama for not conducting subcommittee hearings (who cares?). Further, McCain pressed his idea of establishing a "league of democracies" to contain aggression. This is a phenomenally silly idea (concocted by the same neoconservatives who pushed us into Iraq). Obama demonstrated strength and wisdom by distinguishing his policies to "use military wisely." The realpolitik of 21st-century global dynamics is best understood by Obama.

Webb: McCain finished way ahead, although there was no knockout. McCain was far more knowledgeable, substantive and passionate. He knew the countries, names of leaders, more details and hammered Obama on meeting with enemies without preconditions.

Commander-in-chief

Webb: Anyone watching the debate had to be reassured that the country will be safe in the hands of John McCain, as opposed to a one-term senator who has never made difficult decisions, has never done anything substantive in the Senate, or had any executive experience.