From Deseret News archives:

Oil shale is nothing new, and not the answer

Published: Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2008 12:07 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
One-hundred thirty-one years ago, the following article was published in the Deseret News:

"Oil shale — We have seen a specimen of oil shale, from a large deposit discovered in Spanish Fork Canon(sic). Judges say it is an excellent article, and well adapted for the manufacture of burning gas, petroleum, &c.(sic)

We understand some steps are being taken by some capitalists of this city to develop the claim, which is said to be valuable." — Sept. 5, 1877

Here we are, more than a century later, and oil shale has yet to deliver on its promise.

But we keep hearing about its potential, don't we? Why, there's more oil locked up in that rock than the entire Middle East. Some estimates say there are 800 billion barrels of shale oil in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming, largely on public lands. With crude-oil futures rising to $120.92 a barrel on Monday, it's time to open up the shale fields, right?

Story continues below
Not if you ask Wyoming Gov. Dave Freudenthal. In a recent letter to the Bureau of Reclamation, Gov. Freudenthal referred to oil shale as an "unproven and unknown resource." He urged caution in developing a commercial leasing program. This is interesting, considering that Wyoming is one of the leading energy-producing states in the nation.

In Utah, every member of the congressional delegation is on the oil shale bandwagon. Last week, Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, pushed an energy bill through the House, which included a provision to allow Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to decide whether to open up oil-shale fields in their states for development.

After earlier stating their expressed desire to move ahead with oil-shale exploration activities, Republican Reps. Rob Bishop and Chris Cannon opposed the measure, which now goes to the Senate for its consideration. Both Utah Sens. Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett favor opening up public lands for oil-shale activities.

I suspect that House Republicans don't want anything to do with a Democratic-backed measure passed in September because there's an election in six weeks. Congress has a full plate in attempting to figure out a financial bailout for Wall Street, so this matter may well be shelved. However, a federal moratorium on oil-shale development in the region is set to expire next month, which suggests something needs to happen fairly soon. On Monday, Matheson convinced Democratic House leaders to include language to lift the ban.

Recent comments

Let's turn more of our precious public land over to Big Oil, for...

OK... | Oct. 22, 2008 at 2:49 p.m.

Global Resource Corporation.
NO wasted water
No toxic waste...

Shotei | Sept. 24, 2008 at 7:30 a.m.

Geez the libs don't want us to drill for oil, that would be a silly...

KM | Sept. 23, 2008 at 7:25 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Let's be real. If you are a heterosexual, your not fighting for marriage....

Boy shot following traffic stop

Typical reporting. I wonder what the outcome of the investigation will be?

Max Hall issues apology

So let it be said; so let it be written. He ranted and spewed all he had...

Editorial: East, West and religion

Nothing shuts off the brain and hardens the heart as quickly and effectively...

Meh, the officer had his right to protect himself, the 17 year old should...

Hall's pain reflects self-betrayal

between Morgan Scalley & Steve Tates comments and Max Hall's is that they...

Kathleen and Roy, I am in awe of your spirituality and strength, and know...

It is true that some people can work and retire before the age of 65 or 67....

Yes, historically, politicians know little about war and they certainly don't...

Utes won't respond to Hall

The U of U administration should comment on this. They should take firm...

Advertisements