From Deseret News archives:

Takeover looms for mortgage giants

Published: Sunday, Sept. 7, 2008 12:20 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
The government's planned takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, expected to be announced as early as today, came together hurriedly after advisers poring over the companies' books for the Treasury Department concluded that Freddie's accounting methods had overstated its capital cushion, according to regulatory officials briefed on the matter.

The proposal to place both mortgage giants, which own or back $5.3 trillion in mortgages, into a government-run conservatorship also grew out of deep concern among foreign investors that the companies' debt might not be repaid. Falling home prices, which are expected to lead to more defaults among the mortgages held or guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie, contributed to the urgency, regulators said.

The details of the deal have not fully emerged, but it appears that investors who own the companies' common stock will be virtually wiped out; preferred shareholders, who have priority over other shareholders, may also end up with little. Holders of debt, including many foreign central banks, are expected to receive government backing. Top executives of both companies will be pushed out, according to those briefed on the plan.

Story continues below
While it is not yet possible to calculate the cost of the government's intervention, it could rise into tens of billions of dollars and will probably be among the most expensive rescues ever financed by taxpayers. The takeover comes on the heels of a rescue of the investment bank Bear Stearns, which was sold to JPMorgan Chase in a deal backed by taxpayer dollars. Already, the housing crisis has cost investors and consumers hundreds of billions of dollars.

Both presidential nominees expressed support for the government's plans to take over the companies as necessary. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said as he campaigned in Indiana that not acting could place the housing market in further distress. "These entities are so big and they are so tied into the housing market that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they don't just collapse," Obama told an audience in Terre Haute on Saturday. But he added that the government needed to take steps to guard against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ultimately profiting from the government assistance.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has long been critical of the mortgage finance giants. His running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin, spoke out from a rally in Colorado Springs. "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, they've gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers," Palin said. "The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help."

Recent comments

Is that the show just couldn't continue like the fat cats wanted it...

The Main Problem | Sept. 8, 2008 at 12:41 a.m.

Brother Chuck Schroeder is why conservative logic seems convoluted....

Thanks, Ignorant People | Sept. 7, 2008 at 1:29 p.m.

We are all Americans and need towear the same hat,
McCain said that....

Stop this stupitity | Sept. 7, 2008 at 12:20 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

Pipe down! He's had three straight 10 win season and is on track for his 4th....

Are students safe from predators?

I find it interesting that this article doesn't mention any of the several...

"We have to coach better, play better and compete better," Whittingham said....

I think that Pratt case shows that the answer to the question posed is a big NO.

Utah 21 BYU 22 but, before Utah fans get too excited, consider BYU and...

I read that Hall was going to leave it all on the field the rest of the...

Relieved Cougs prep for Falcons

For all you Bronco bashers -- have you forgotten about Crowton? Things could...

POWs remembered at Fort Douglas

Peace and tolerance are worthy efforts. My sister and I were very impressed...

Wounded Utes limp home

The correct realist outlook shows Utah slipping back to being mediocre at...

MWC expand? Get rid of deadweight

So the presidents would never do it. But I totally agree.

Advertisements
Advertisement