From Deseret News archives:

Lowering legal drinking age an absurd idea

Published: Sunday, Aug. 24, 2008 1:05 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Imagine if the president of a Utah college signed a petition asking lawmakers to lower the legal age for buying cigarettes.

And imagine they did so because they wanted to reduce teenage smoking.

Sounds silly and misdirected, doesn't it? You can imagine the public reaction.

So where is the reaction now that Westminster College President Michael Bassis signed the Amethyst Initiative petition asking state lawmakers to lower the legal drinking age from 21 to 18, and that they do so in order to put an end to teenage binge drinking?

OK, before you jump on your computer keys and start sending off nasty e-mails, I understand the basic differences between smoking and drinking. You cannot smoke responsibly, whereas people who drink in moderation and stay off the roads when impaired may be said to be drinking responsibly. Smoking, in any degree, causes physical harm.

But there are sound reasons why government should prohibit young adults from drinking.

Story continues below
Two years ago, the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission and various private organizations held town hall meetings across Utah to discuss new evidence showing how anyone under 20, and even many people well into their 20s, suffer far greater damage from alcohol consumption than do older adults. Specifically, they suffer irreparable harm to parts of the brain that are developing the ability to make sound judgments, decide important matters or control destructive impulses. Alcohol also can harm a young person's ability to learn and remember.

Put in this context, it no longer seems so contradictory for government to allow people to vote or serve in the military at age 18 but to prohibit them from drinking until 21.

Bassis and the other college leaders (he was one of 115 presidents and chancellors nationwide, as of Wednesday, who signed the petition, but the only one from Utah) have made it clear that they, too, are concerned about alcohol consumption among their students. I believe they are sincere, but that brings us to the heart of the matter, which is their belief, stated on the Amethyst Initiative Web site, that the 21-year-old age limit "is not working, and, specifically, that it has created a culture of dangerous binge drinking on their campuses."

The theory seems to be that young college students are more prone to gorge themselves on alcohol because they cannot legally purchase it. If it's illegal, it's more enticing.

Recent comments

In my opinion, the age limits for smoking and drinking should be...

Ryan | Sept. 12, 2008 at 8:08 a.m.

hey, im 18 i and i would like to say that the age of 21 to drink is...

Anonymous | Sept. 8, 2008 at 8:56 p.m.

It's funny to say that smoking in any amount is harmful, inferring...

Drinking harms too | Aug. 28, 2008 at 8:00 p.m.

previousnext

Latest comments

"Why not talk to police?" Are they kidding? No one should ever talk to police...

I don't see that much "Tradition, Spirit, Honor." (from the BYU football...

I agree with chase let's forgive and forget

How about it Hmmm: If you were president, what would you do? It's easy to...

Between Peterson's observations on the coherence of Mitchell's writtings,...

"After a successful NFL football career one would have much to add to...

Wow!! I'm amazed at the readers who are belittling this excellent article....

Utes won't respond to Hall

you guyd just let both things go. both coleges say sorry tell their fans to...

America! Good, one person - although they didn't dare post a name - lets...

Hall reprimanded by MWC

Having been to both LaVell Edwards Stadium and Rice Eccles when the Aggies...

Advertisements