From Deseret News archives:

Roads meant to be shared civilly

Published: Thursday, Aug. 14, 2008 12:16 a.m. MDT
 |  E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + - 
Waiting for a clear chance to pass a cyclist will probably delay a motorist only a few seconds at most. But just as is the case when motorists are stuck behind someone going only 70 miles per hour on the freeway, there is occasionally a feeling of frustration — a frustration born from not being as free to zoom around as fast (or as slow) as we'd like.

Bicyclists, coincidentally, are out on the roads seeking that same freedom — they just do it on two wheels while wearing brightly colored lycra.

A common refrain from motorists annoyed with close calls on the road involving bicyclists is the frequent scoffing at the laws of the road shown — and, again, they have a valid point.

Stop signs are frequently rolled through — kind of the way a lot of cars do. Lanes are changed without clear signaling — kind of like too many local motorists do.

I'm an avid cyclist. I stop at every stoplight and try to do the same at stop signs. But I admit to scanning the streets around me and rolling through an intersection if I know I'm not putting myself in danger.

I'll be the first to admit many bike vs. car accidents are not the fault of the motorist — though quite often they, in fact, are.

But seeing someone out there running a red light or failing to signal when changing lanes in a car doesn't give anyone the right to throw things out the window at them any more than it does to a cyclist.

Story continues below
When a cyclist impedes traffic, there are generally three reasons to do so:

1. A bicycle has every right to ride in the middle of the lane, so the sense of entitlement rules; 2. Doing so is sometimes the safest option when shoulders are littered with hazards and debris; 3. The cyclist is oblivious to the world around him or her possibly because of an iPod stuck in their ear.

When a motorist tries to run a bicycle into the curb, though, there is pretty much one reason — the motorist is a jerk with entitlement issues.

Whatever the case, virtually all roads shared by cyclists and motorists are intended to be shared civilly.

Would you run over a person who was walking in the street or throw things at that person? Then why do the same thing to someone on a bicycle? Are you really in that big of a hurry?


E-mail: jeborn@desnews.com

Recent comments

Thanks for some common sense, and your coverage of the Tour of Utah!

Bike 4 Freedom | Aug. 15, 2008 at 10:26 a.m.

Image

Jackie Concannon, left, and Eric Bunce bike their way up Emigration Canyon in Salt Lake City on July 5.

previousnext

Latest comments

Bullfeathers!* *just kidding

Bronco is too conservative. That may be the undoing in the end.

Where does it reference public golf courses in the U.S. Constitution? Just...

Letters: Reckless imbalance

You are responsible, Earl. You shop for the lowest price goods.

Good grief, Russell. Do you still believe there is a Commie under every...

Great review Seth! Keep 'em coming!

My dad worked really hard for my money. To heck with all of you!

Here is logic for you. Store sells only 18 laptops a few years ago for...

Letters: Left-wing hypocrisy

OK, just Googled "Thomas Lipscomb" and "Obama" and found nothing but...

This game further illustrates how neither of these teams are as good as...

Advertisements